1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sphinxa [80]
3 years ago
12

Explain how beginning the story with the dialogue between Rainsford and Whitney contributes to both the authors characterization

of Rainsford and the story's mood. Cite evidence from the story in your response.
English
1 answer:
Zanzabum3 years ago
5 0

Answer and explanation:

Rainsford and Whitney are characters in Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game". They are both hunters who are traveling in a yatch. <u>During their dialog, they begin to discuss the way the game (the prey) feels when it is being hunted.</u> Whitney has empathy for the game, thinking animals can at least understand fear. <u>Rainsford, on the other hand, has no empathy whatsoever. He sees the world as divided into those who hunt and those who are hunted. He seems himself as lucky for being the one who hunts</u>. See the dialog below:

<em>"The best sport in the world," agreed Rainsford. </em>

<em>"For the hunter," amended Whitney. "Not for the jaguar." </em>

<em>"Don't talk rot, Whitney," said Rainsford. "You're a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?" </em>

<em>"Perhaps the jaguar does," observed Whitney. </em>

<em>"Bah! They've no understanding." </em>

<em>"Even so, I rather think they understand one thing--fear. The fear of pain and the fear of death." </em>

<em>"Nonsense," laughed Rainsford. "This hot weather is making you soft, Whitney. Be a realist. The world is made up of two classes--the hunters and the huntees. Luckily, you and I are hunters. Do you think we've passed that island yet?"</em>

<em />

<u>If the above part of the dialog helps us understand Rainsford arrogance</u>, the second part helps characterize the story's mood. <u>Their yatch is now passing by an island that is famous for being evil. The mood of the story becomes suspenseful and mysterious:</u>

<em>"I can't tell in the dark. I hope so." </em>

<em>"Why? " asked Rainsford. </em>

<em>"The place has a reputation--a bad one." </em>

<em>"Cannibals?" suggested Rainsford. </em>

<em>"Hardly. Even cannibals wouldn't live in such a God-forsaken place. But it's gotten into sailor lore, somehow. Didn't you notice that the crew's nerves seemed a bit jumpy today?" </em>

<em>"They were a bit strange, now you mention it. Even Captain Nielsen--" </em>

<em>"Yes, even that tough-minded old Swede, who'd go up to the devil himself and ask him for a light. Those fishy blue eyes held a look I never saw there before. All I could get out of him was 'This place has an evil name among seafaring men, sir.' Then he said to me, very gravely, 'Don't you feel anything?'--as if the air about us was actually poisonous. Now, you mustn't laugh when I tell you this--I did feel something like a sudden chill. </em>

<em>"There was no breeze. The sea was as flat as a plate-glass window. We were drawing near the island then. What I felt was a--a mental chill; a sort of sudden dread." </em>

<em>"Pure imagination," said Rainsford. </em>

<em>"One superstitious sailor can taint the whole ship's company with his fear."</em>

It turns out that Rainsford will fall from the yatch and end up on the island, where he will be hunted by General Zaroff as if he were an animal.

You might be interested in
Read paragraphs 8–11 of the text. Then answer the multiple-choice questions that follow.
ivolga24 [154]

Answer:

The commentary which best responds to this text evidence is:

A) This text evidence shows that storytelling in movies is tighter and smaller in scope than novels.

Explanation:

Let's highlight the part that helps us find the answer:

<em>Movies have always seemed to me a much tighter form of storytelling than novels, requiring greater compression, and in that sense </em><em>falling somewhere between the short story and the novel in scale</em><em>.”</em>

<u>This passage makes it very clear that movies are greater in scale than short stories, but smaller than novels. </u>With this information in mind, we can easily work with elimination to find our option.

<u>Option A says precisely that. It states that storytelling in movies is smaller in scope than novels, which is correct. We have already found the answer, but let's take a look at the other options.</u>

Option B says movies are more like a short story than a novel, which is not what the evidence says. Movies fall between the two genres; it is not more similar to one than the other. Option C says storytelling is similar in both movies and television, but that is completely unrelated to the evidence we are supposed to analyze. Finally, option D states movies are larger in scale than novels, which is the opposite of what the evidence supports.

3 0
3 years ago
(PLEASE HELP) i need help asap on 1-5 questions please someone help its 10th Grade English i'll mark as brainlist
Anarel [89]

Answer:

1. is A, B, C and D

2. Root , D

3. A and D

4 A affix

5. A and D

Explanation:

Brief explanation to show you how I got my answers.

1. A has the suffix ical

B  tic

.c has ment

D does not have a suffix

E has ence.

 2. The answer is root because it is not affix, not suffix or prefix

  so it is root.

  3. A because the prefix auto

D - In

  4. it is again not suffix or prefix, or postscript so affix.

5.  A, auto changes it, because bio means life and auto means self so it changes to that persons life instead of a biography about someone else it is about ones life.

incoherence - the quality of being illogical, inconsistent, or unclear. Without the in- prefix it means the opposite the quality of being logical and consistent.

Hope this helps you let me know if you have any questions!

3 0
3 years ago
Since I have so much experience working with children I am a good candidate for your childcare position my experience includes h
Nezavi [6.7K]
The answer is ethos and pathos.
3 0
2 years ago
What do both "To My Dear Loving Husband" and "To the King's Most Excellent Majesty" communicate to the reader?
Fudgin [204]
<span>"To My Dear and Loving Husband" and "To the King's Most Excellent Majesty" are both great literary works. Both communicates to the reader about the idea of perseverance in love. In "To My Dear and  Loving Husband" shows the wife's valuing of love for her husband. In "To the Kings's Most Excellent Majesty" talks about the love directly from God by guarding him and let evil fly away.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Identify the adjective in the following sentence
Soloha48 [4]
C. Newborn.

This is because it is describing the baby

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which part of the sentence is the nonrestrictive modifier?
    15·2 answers
  • What is conspicuous?
    11·1 answer
  • In 300 words or less, explain how ancient Greek Drama is different from our contemporary experience at the movies or at the thea
    6·2 answers
  • Which is a run-on sentence?
    7·2 answers
  • How does Jim respond to the stories huck reads about royalty
    12·1 answer
  • 1.Which nation on the map had the “best” colonies? Why?
    9·2 answers
  • After two ) helpings of turkey, I left the table. too two to<br>​
    14·1 answer
  • What connection does the author draw between what researchers have learned about babies’ social development and parenting
    13·1 answer
  • He build his house there .the word there is a <br>​
    8·1 answer
  • Identify the Participle Phrase.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!