1. Richard Clarke does not have a point when he discussed breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments because what this achieves is increased departmentalization.
2. I would not split the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments. Rather, I would split the department into operational units to manage the various threats that the United States faces while keeping the department as one.
<h3>What are the goals of the Department of Homeland Security?</h3>
The Department of Homeland Security, created after the 9/11 attacks, to strengthen the security architecture of the nation at home, has the responsibility to pursue the following security goals:
- Prevent terrorism
- Enhance security
- Secure and manage U.S. borders
- Enforce and administer U.S. immigration laws.
Under these broad goals, the Department of Homeland Security oversees the national security of the United States from numerous threats.
Some of the direct responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security include:
- Border security
- Aviation security
- Countering terrorism
- Emergency response
- Chemical facility inspection
- IT and cybersecurity security
- Natural disaster planning and response.
Thus, instead of discussing splitting the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments, Richard Clarke should look at ways to strengthen and empower the department to achieve its goals.
Learn more about the Department of Homeland Security at brainly.com/question/19521614
#SPJ1
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The given statement is false.
The reason for the the statement to be false is that the 22nd amendment states that no Person can be elected as the president of the country more than once also the person cannot contest as a President even if the person holds or acted as the president for more than two years in his entire lifetime.
Answer:
breach of the implied of merchantability
Explanation:
Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.
Sam committed fraud and Rachel can sue him for the money he owes and damages
It must be fitted with guards and Safety switches
