Nationalism and Imperialism are two terms that should be understood in different senses. Nationalism is based on aggressiveness in its concept. On the other hand imperialism is constructive in its concept.
Imperialism is a kind of rule that aims at bringing equality of values, beliefs, and expertise among empires and kingdoms through domination and is autocratic in nature and also sometimes monolithic in its concept. Imperialism is a kind of western undertaking that employs expansionistic views and ideas in its ideals. Nationalism on the other hand paves the way for enmity among nations. A nationalist feels that his own country is better than any other country.
According to the great thinker George Orwell, nationalism is deeply rooted in emotions and rivalry. It makes one contemptuous of the virtues possessed by other nations. Nationalism makes one intolerant towards the progress made by other nations.
Nationalism makes one think that the people belonging to one’s own country should be considered one’s equal. Such thoughts are not present the ideals of imperialism. A nationalist does not mind about the deficiencies of his country but on the contrary takes into account only its virtues.
A nationalist strives for the domination of a nation and expresses his love for the country in an aggressive way. An imperialist though creates unequal economic relationship between states yet he maintains the unequal relationships based on domination. This is a subtle difference between the two terms.
Nationalism gives importance to unity of by way of cultural background and linguistic environment. The factors of cultural background and linguistic environment are not taken into account by the imperialist to a great extent.
A. because if this wasn't true we wouldnt have had a war based off our freedom.The revolutionary war
Answer: Where are the answers my guy.
<span>The Truman Doctrine was a response to the growing influence of communism in Europe and Asia.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The effect of the emphasis on loyalty to a group that had the revolutionary movement in the French people was precise that it strengthened the solidarity ties of the Frenchs who sought in that movement, and avenue to equity, liberty, and progress. It made the French people more united for a while, enduring the consequences of the movement, united. Yes, to French revolutionaries, the ideal of fraternity was just as important as the Enlightenment ideals of liberty and equality.
On the other hand, if we compared this French result to the American culture after its revolution, we can say that American colonists started to dive because of the formation of factions or political parties with divergent ideas that sometimes we're not the same as the ideas instituted by the founding fathers of the country. That is why President George Washington was not so fond of political parties.
