Answer:
The sample ignores the adult portion of the city’s residents.
Children are probably more likely to be in favor of a new youth center.
The sample does not include children in middle school or high school.
In the Hollywood sign I think
The correct answer is C. She should include all sources in her bibliography and use in-text citations to reference them in her paper.
Explanation:
Most papers and documents related to the academic context, usually require using other sources or authors to develop in a complete and accurate way your ideas. However, as you are using someone else ideas to support your ideas this should be clear for the reader and you should recognize to whom these ideas belong. Because of this, when you use quotations (the words of an author) or paraphrasing (using other words to express the ideas of someone else) from any source including primary or secondary sources (documents, records, photographs, etc) you need to reference them in the text before or after you cite them (in-text citation) and additionally to this, at the end of the document you will need to list all the sources (reference list) including basic information about the source such as the name of the author, the date of the source and the title of it.
Answer:
The purpose of persuasion in writing is to convince, motivate, or move readers toward a certain point of view, or opinion. The act of trying to persuade automatically implies more than one opinion on the subject can be argued.
The idea of an argument often conjures up images of two people yelling and screaming in anger. In writing, however, an argument is very different. An argument is a reasoned opinion supported and explained by evidence. To argue in writing is to advance knowledge and ideas in a positive way. Written arguments often fail when they employ ranting rather than reasoning.
Most people have strong views on controversial topics (ones that inspire extreme points of view or opinions) and are often very willing to share those strong views. However, imagine you are having a discussion with someone who is only willing to share a particular point of view, ignoring yours, which may be in opposition. The ideas presented by that person would be very narrow, almost as if the person has tunnel vision and is merely expressing a personal opinion. If that person does provide you with facts, they may often be skewed or not from a credible source. After the discussion, there is only a slight chance you would be convinced of the other person’s point of view. You may have new ideas you had not considered before or a new perspective, but you would probably not be thoroughly convinced because that person has not made any attempt to present a well-rounded, fact-based point of view. This is why it is essential for you to not only provide your reader with strong, substantiated evidenced, but also to ensure you present an argument that looks at the topic
Answer:
C is the correct answer
Explanation:
it said "...any other ideas for..." it wouldn't make sense if u put "how to" but instead "the starting.."
if u get this wrong fe free to send an angry comment XD
