America had imperial ambitions following a quick victory in the Spanish-American War of 1898. The American flag flies from the Philippines and Hawaii in the Pacific to Cuba and Puerto Rico in the Caribbean.
<span />
Answer:
U.S supreme court
Explanation:
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.
Interpretive claims is not necessary in a historical essay.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
A historical essay is defined as an essay illustrating assertions about historic events that are substantiated by adequate evidence to give the viewers a greater clarity and knowledge of that specific event.
Interpretive claims are points of view which are explored and evaluated in an essay. Although interpretive claims could be well-versed and advocated by historical record, it is regarded subjective since the writer uses it to voice their opinion. They are not essential for a historical essay because those claims represent the writer's opinion or perception of an event or topic that is not far mandated in a historical essay.
Answer:
<h3>Yes, when the US Supreme Court interprets the US Constitution, it sometimes, in effect, make new laws.</h3>
Explanation:
- The provision that gives Supreme Court the power to interpret the constitution is called Judicial Activism.
- Through this provision, the Supreme Court can interpret the US Constitution and the laws contained in it according to the need of the situation.
- The Supreme Court may invalidate any legislative decision or executive order through Judicial Activism. Making such “activism” is on the part of the Supreme Court job.
