Answer:
(A) less
Explanation:
Given a positive inflation rate, the real value of the dollar will depreciate by the rate of inflation annually.
Thus, for a house that cost $100,000 today, given a 3% inflation rate, it would cost (100,000 * 1.03 = ) $103,000 after a year.
This means, $100,000 today will have the same value as $103,000 one year later.
Therefore, repayments, which will likely be a fixed sum every year, will have a lower purchasing power as the year progresses.
Answer: $0
Explanation:
Available-for-sale securities simply refers to the debt securities that are bought but with the intention that they'll be sold before they mature. They're typically reported at their fair value.
The gain that will be reported by Jeremiah Corporation in the December 31, 2021, income statement relative to the portfolio is $0. This is because for available-for-sale securities, there'll be no reports on holding gains or losses incurred.
<span>A german firm raising capital by selling stock through the london stock exchange is an example of transnational financing.
Transnational financing occurs when a firm goes to another country to raise capital through the issue of stocks and bonds.
</span>
Answer:
A. Jack cannot bring in the evidence of the oral agreement because of the Parol Evidence Rule.
Explanation:
The Parol Evidence rule is a rule in the Anglo-American common law that governs or determines the types or kinds of evidence that parties to a contract dispute can introduce when trying to determine the specific terms of a contract.
The rule also prevents introduction of further evidences by a party after a final written document or agreement has been reached. Things such as the content of oral discussions from earlier in the negotiation process, as evidence of a different intent as to the terms of the contract. The rule states that "extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary a written contract". The term " patrol" refers to "word of mouth" hence it is referred to oral pleadings in a court case.
Therefore from the question, Jack cannot bring in evidence of oral agreement into the court for evaluation because of Patrol Evidence Rule.
Answer: spoofing or phishing
Explanation: Spoofing is the act of concealing, as a known, reliable source, a communication from an anonymous source.Spoofing can be extended to emails, phone calls, and websites, or may be more sophisticated, such as an IP address spoofing device, Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) or Domain Name System (DNS) server.
Fraudulent sending of emails by reputable companies to force individuals to reveal personal information, such as passwords and credit card numbers.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the given case relates to spoofing or phishing.
