1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
julia-pushkina [17]
3 years ago
10

Which resource contributed significantly to the early industrial development of England and Germany?

History
2 answers:
igomit [66]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C- coal

Explanation:

Coal is an important source of fuel even today. Early industrialization dependence on coal can be understood with its use in a wide sphere. Coal was used in the production of iron and it was needed for the fuel in seam engines. coal was used in bakery to the big industries as it was the most efficient and economical fuel at that time. Therefore countries like Britain and Germany relied heavily on coal.

tester [92]3 years ago
4 0
The resource  that contributed significantly to the development of England and Germany is Coal.
You might be interested in
The new jersey plan was closest to the
arlik [135]
It was closest to the Articles of Confederation.
3 0
3 years ago
Discuss other motivations for European migration, particularly those that led to the desire to establish colonies in the America
kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

try this one

Explanation:

Many Europeans were looking for better social, political, and economic opportunities, and they felt and hoped that America was their dreamland. One of the reasons why people left England was for religious freedom

7 0
2 years ago
What was the result of the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961?
algol [13]

It's D
Hope it helps.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the key arguments behind the Elitist view of interest group politics.
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer: The United States allows its citizens to participate in government in many ways. The United States also has many different levels and branches of government that any citizen or group might approach. Many people take this as evidence that U.S. citizens, especially as represented by competing groups, are able to influence government actions. Some political theorists, however, argue that this is not the case. They claim that only a handful of economic and political elites have any influence over government. Many Americans fear that a set of elite citizens is really in charge of government in the United States and that others have no influence. This belief is called the elite theory of government. In contrast to that perspective is the pluralist theory of government, which says that political power rests with competing interest groups who share influence in government. Pluralist theorists assume that citizens who want to get involved in the system do so because of the great number of access points to government. That is, the U.S. system, with several levels and branches, has many places where people and groups can engage the government.

The foremost supporter of elite theory was C. Wright Mills. In his book, The Power Elite, Mills argued that government was controlled by a combination of business, military, and political elites. Most are highly educated, often graduating from prestigious universities. According to elite theory, the wealthy use their power to control the nation’s economy in such a way that those below them cannot advance economically. Their wealth allows the elite to secure for themselves important positions in politics. They then use this power to make decisions and allocate resources in ways that benefit them. Politicians do the bidding of the wealthy instead of attending to the needs of ordinary people, and order is maintained by force. Indeed, those who favor government by the elite believe the elite are better fit to govern and that average citizens are content to allow them to do so. In apparent support of the elite perspective, one-third of U.S. presidents have attended Ivy League schools, a much higher percentage than the rest of the U.S. population.

4 0
3 years ago
Why did fascist nations like Germany and Italy
DerKrebs [107]

The correct option is C. Fascist nations like Germany and Italy have no problem taking over the new nations because the new nations had no military to combat the invasion by Germany and Italy.

<h3>What is a Fascism?</h3>

Fascism is a  form of political system headed by a dictator in which the government controls business and labor and opposition is not permitted.

Thus, the nation's fascist nations like Germany and Italy faced no problems while taking over the new nations because the new nations have no strong military to combat the invasion by Germany and Italy.

Learn more about Fascism here:

brainly.com/question/11507413

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the world's largest rainforest?
    5·2 answers
  • Many Cuban Americans fled the dictatorship of Fidel Castro and no reside in south Florida.
    9·1 answer
  • How was the Three-Fifths Compromise like the Great Compromise?
    13·2 answers
  • Question 1 Unsaved
    11·1 answer
  • How many amendments does our Constitution have?
    11·1 answer
  • What are the 3 formal qualifications necessary to become POTUS?
    14·1 answer
  • Native american society was a ______ society; European society was _____
    7·1 answer
  • What was affected by the exchange of biology, food, and natural resources during the Columbian Exchange? A much of the known wor
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the mood of a lynching. What were those "in charge" likely thinking, feeling,
    7·1 answer
  • Explain how Confucius teaching was different from Buddha
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!