Answer:
C I believe
Explanation:
Makes the most sense, cuz its not a disadvantage.
Both mobilizations were important, but the industrial one seems to have greater weight, since this influences the population in general, and the military affected only where a conflict developed, it mobilized all available resources to obtain the highest military capacity in a specific area, but the industrial one had the capacity to produce what was necessary for war, as a fundamental and determining element in the outcome.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you do not specify a specific topic to develop the argument. An argument about what?
What is your compelling question? We cannot cite evidence of your research because you did not mention what is the topic of your research.
If we can help with something, we are going to set our own example based on our own topic.
How about the following.
Compelling question:
Was the Revolutionary War the last option for Patriots to get Independence from Great Britain?
Argument/Evidence:
1.- Yes, it was the only option after the number of aggressions and aggravations from the British crown. The English government never had the "openness" to negotiate another valid solution.
2.- Colonists were sick and tired of the heavy taxation imposed by the English government. We are talking about injust taxation such as the Navigation Acts, the Stamp Act, the Townshend Act, or the Tea Act.
3.- The worst part of it was that colonists had to pay those taxations but they did not have a voice in the British Parliament.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress onMay 30, 1854<span>. It allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The Act served to repeal the Missouri Compromise of </span>1820<span> which prohibited slavery north.</span>
The English civil war led to the rise of parliament. Hope this helps!