All categories

3 years ago

Help please! You'll get 40 points :D

Mathematics

2 answers:

uysha [10]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The difference:

128.04 - 8.287 = 119.753

The product:

1389 × 6.58 = 9139.62

The sum:

840.89 + 928 = 1768.89

The quotient:

74.4 ÷ 0.8 = 93

bixtya [17]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

840.89+928= 1768.89

74.4 / 0.8= 93

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps <3

You might be interested in

The length of a rectangle is shown below: On a coordinate grid from negative 6 to positive 6 on the x-axis and on the y-axis, tw

sukhopar [10]

Answer:

Would be the answer D(1, −4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Excuse me if i'm wrong, it seems like you have the same test or almost. And this was the answer on mine. I hope it works out for you!

4 0

3 years ago

A food safety guideline is that the mercury in fish should be below 1 part per million (ppm). Listed below are the amounts of m

posledela

Answer:

Check the attached document for the solutions, cheers

Step-by-step explanation:

Download docx

7 0

3 years ago

How do u round 14,494 to the nearest thousand

Reil [10]

Look at the digit one number place to the right of the thousands place, the hundreds. In this case it is another 4. Since it is less than 5, the thousands place will stay the same. If it were 5 or greater, the thousands place would go up by one number. 14,494 rounded to the nearest thousand is 14,000

7 0

3 years ago

The greatest common factor of two different prime numbers is 1

svetlana [45]

I hope this helps you

8 0

3 years ago

Let X1,X2......X7 denote a random sample from a population having mean μ and variance σ. Consider the following estimators of μ:

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

a) In order to check if an estimator is unbiased we need to check this condition:

$E(\theta) = \mu$

And we can find the expected value of each estimator like this:

$E(\theta_1 ) = \frac{1}{7} E(X_1 +X_2 +... +X_7) = \frac{1}{7} [E(X_1) +E(X_2) +....+E(X_7)]= \frac{1}{7} 7\mu= \mu$

So then we conclude that $\theta_1$ is unbiased.

For the second estimator we have this:

$E(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{2} [2E(X_1) -E(X_3) +E(X_5)]=\frac{1}{2} [2\mu -\mu +\mu] = \frac{1}{2} [2\mu]= \mu$

And then we conclude that $\theta_2$ is unbiaed too.

b) For this case first we need to find the variance of each estimator:

$Var(\theta_1) = \frac{1}{49} (Var(X_1) +...+Var(X_7))= \frac{1}{49} (7\sigma^2) = \frac{\sigma^2}{7}$

And for the second estimator we have this:

$Var(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2 -\sigma^2 +\sigma^2)= \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2)= \sigma^2$

And the relative efficiency is given by:

$RE= \frac{Var(\theta_1)}{Var(\theta_2)}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{7}}{\sigma^2}= \frac{1}{7}$

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we assume that we have a random sample given by: $X_1, X_2,....,X_7$ and each $X_i \sim N (\mu, \sigma)$

Part a

In order to check if an estimator is unbiased we need to check this condition:

$E(\theta) = \mu$

And we can find the expected value of each estimator like this:

$E(\theta_1 ) = \frac{1}{7} E(X_1 +X_2 +... +X_7) = \frac{1}{7} [E(X_1) +E(X_2) +....+E(X_7)]= \frac{1}{7} 7\mu= \mu$

So then we conclude that $\theta_1$ is unbiased.

For the second estimator we have this:

$E(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{2} [2E(X_1) -E(X_3) +E(X_5)]=\frac{1}{2} [2\mu -\mu +\mu] = \frac{1}{2} [2\mu]= \mu$

And then we conclude that $\theta_2$ is unbiaed too.

Part b

For this case first we need to find the variance of each estimator:

$Var(\theta_1) = \frac{1}{49} (Var(X_1) +...+Var(X_7))= \frac{1}{49} (7\sigma^2) = \frac{\sigma^2}{7}$

And for the second estimator we have this:

$Var(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2 -\sigma^2 +\sigma^2)= \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2)= \sigma^2$

And the relative efficiency is given by:

$RE= \frac{Var(\theta_1)}{Var(\theta_2)}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{7}}{\sigma^2}= \frac{1}{7}$

5 0

3 years ago