Answer: Unconditioned Stimulus
B) Conditioned Stimulus
Explanation:
In Classical conditioning, learning occurs when a neutral stimulus is paired with an unconditioned stimulus, the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus which can bring about conditioned responses.
For example, unconditioned stimulus (food) is presented repeatedly just after the presentation of the neutral stimulus (bell). After conditioning, the neutral stimulus alone produces a conditioned response (salivation), thereby becoming a conditioned stimulus. From this example, if a dog salivates whenever it sees food but a bell is rung before the food is presented, Overtime just ringing the bell will make the dog to salivate.
Answer:
advocate
Explanation:
Anti-racism
This is simply the act of genuinely standing against and opposing of racism by advocating for changes in political, economic, and social life etc. This is the practice of confronting, eradicating racism. Anti-racism tends to be an individualized approach, and set up in opposition to individual racist behaviors and impacts.
An Advocate
This is an individual who is actively pleading for a cause and also putting an idea forward. They simply want to shape public perception to effect change that sometimes do not require changes in law.
It aims to raise public awareness and acceptance as well as influence public policy and resource allocations. Advocacy also mean to speak on behalf of another person by recommending or punishing. They simply to create a just society in which all people have equal opportunities and resources to push toward their own goals.
Answer:
The League of Nations was a international organization founded after the Paris Peace Conference, 1919. The League's goals included disarmament, preventing war through collective security, settling disputes between countries through negotiation diplomacy and improving global welfare
Explanation:
BRAIN PLZ
Answer:B is the answer hope this helps
Explanation: have a great day
Answer:
The study has received many ethical criticisms, including lack of fully informed consent by participants as Zimbardo himself did not know what would happen in the experiment (it was unpredictable). Also, the prisoners did not consent to being 'arrested' at home.
Explanation:
