Answer:
The conflict theory criticizes the stratification of society because in this process some people get advantages of stratification and others get disadvantages.
Explanation:
Conflicts theory describes that stratification only beneficial for some people in society. This process is not helpful for all society. For example, conflicts occur when it argued that a basketball player gets millions of dollars a year in the contract whereas a school teacher gets only lonesome salary in a year. This is the stratification conflicts that perpetuate and create conflicts and inequality in society.
The conflicts theorist just want to spread awareness about the inequalities about the societies. Stratification plays a role in people's relationship to production. People are separated by a thin line in which either they work as an employee or be the owner of the company.
Thus here society could not be always Unstratified or classless for very simple reasons.
Answer:
C, your history of making payments on time.
Explanation:
Making sure that you have a good credit score is important, because it tells companies how much they can trust you, and if they can trust you at all. If you have a worse credit score, they might not let you borrow as much money.
<span>The right answer is assuming greater similarity among members of outgroups. This
is because it is easier to assume the similarities between people than
the differences, this in order to improve the interaction and
communication with outgroups. <span>This phenomenon is common when groups with diverse origins meet and interact.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
According to the text "Evaluating a Case Study: Developing a Practical Ethical Viewpoint," Ms. Smith, Mrs. Taylor and Mr. Jones cannot agree on who deserves to win a prize for outstanding moral behaviour. The candidates are Mr. Big and Mrs. Little. The main ethical concerns are: whether one big, good act counts more than many small good acts; whether benefitting one person greatly is better than benefitting many in small ways; and whether a good act that does not benefit the actor is better than an act that does benefit him.
The approach that I would use is utilitarianism. According to this approach, the "most" moral act is the one that contributes to the greater happiness of a greater number of people. According to this idea, Mr. Big would win the award. This is because Mr. Big saved a man from drowning. However, this man was an important businessman, which means that Mr. Big also saved all of the man's employees from having to face unemployment. He benefitted the largest number of people.
