Answer:
there was an uncertain supply of workers
Explanation:
The plantation economy blossomed in Southern America and because of this, Southern plantation owners were in need of more laborers. They resorted to <em>"indentured servants."</em> These servants were tied to help in the plantation for <em>5 to 7 years</em> and after which, they'd already be set free. In exchange, they'd be given<em> shelter, food and clothing. </em>However, <em>most of the servants didn't survive long enough to complete their contract. </em>Many died because of diseases while others suffered under very cruel masters. It was also hard to form families because of a huge ratio gap between men and women. This decreased the population of the indentured servants and created an uncertain supply of workers.
I believe the answer is Lack of legal marriage-<span>Lead to nuclear family.
This cause a large portion of African-american kids have to grow up with only the support of single parent.
Eventually, the majority of the single parent unable to divide time between work and child caring well enough and caused a defect in either economic or child development.</span>
Answer:
The correct statements are ; B , C and D
Explanation:
Applying the tentative acceptance of Hypothesis the correct statements that properly describe the discovery of Neptune are :
<em>The relationship between the mathematical models used in the formulation of the Neptune hypothesis and the behavior of the planet Uranus are part of what makes the hypothesis internally coherent.
</em>
<em>The effects of interplanetary gravitational forces implied by the Neptune hypothesis contributed to the internal coherence of the hypothesis.
</em>
<em> The movement of the planet Uranus was explained by the hypothesis of an eighth planet.</em>
These statements properly describe the discovery of Neptune because they fulfil the basis on which tentative hypothesis is acceptable ( i.e. there is presence of Internal coherence which helps strengthen a hypothesis )
Answer:
Explanation:
Being the largests, most internationally represented in the most powerful intergovernmental organisation, the UN by its nature is doomed to be ridiculed for being superficial, biased and ineffective.
When a large number of actors and factors come into play, such an organisation can not have a simple black or white outlook. UN has not been created by aliens from a different planet that have no ulterior motives in the outcome of its work. On the contrary, it was created by people's governments. And each of the government, leaders and agencies have their own perspectives and considerations regarding every matter. That is why the performance of such organisations as the UN can not be clear and easy to satisfy everyone. Look for example, at the Israel and Palestine conundrum.
At the same time, although many issues addressed by the critics do exist, the overall contribution of the UN to the international peace and security can be considered beneficial for the world.
