Answer: He comes to realize that he is drawn to a career that challenges his mind.
Explanation:
From the story, Craig worked at the hotel and really loved working there but on this particular day, he listened to the conversation of some people who were involved in advertising and this really captivated him.
Fo the rest of the day, he was thinking about advertising and his mind was racing. He spoke to his friend Maya about advertising and how he was really interested. Therefore, Craig changed over the course of the story as he comes to realize that he is drawn to a career that challenges his mind.
<span>"An action, process, or skill" denoted by the combining root: rearmament, tournament, management."A result, object, or agent of an action" named by the joining root: entombment, enthrallment, agreement."The means or instrument of an action": implement, medicament, reinforcement.<span>"The place of an action" named by the first root: battlement, ambushment, settlement.</span></span>
The blank is "king".
Because he couldn't get permission to divorce from the Pope, he changed the religion of England.
Answer:
Indeed slavery and segregation have been strange paradoxes in a nation founded on the principle that all men are created equal.
Explanation:
and i dont see any choices
Answer:
He is referring to people who reject a responsibility that is theirs.
Explanation:
Through the context of your question, we can see that you are referring to the article "Hers" written by Jacoby, where he reflects on censorship, feminism, obscenity and p0r.n0g*4p** within a society. For Jacoby, the censorship of works with content considered obscene and p0r.n0g*4p*c is an insult to the first constitutional amendment, since for him these works represent the freedom of expression that is allowed within the country. Within this context, he states that it is not the State's duty to carry out this type of censorship, but that each citizen must decide whether or not he wants to consume this type of content, when he is of the right age to make that decision.
Although in the article, he agrees that children should not have access to such works, he says that it is the duty of parents to prevent children from having access to works with obscene content and not the duty of the government. In this case, children cannot be used as an argument to defend p0r.n0g*4p** censorship, except by people who reject their responsibility because of the general desire to transfer that responsibility to institutions.