Answer:
Conducting a 360- degree feedback process
Explanation:
A 360-degree feedback is a method or a process by which feedback or opinions from an employee's colleagues, subordinates and supervisor, as well as a self-evaluation by the individual themselves is gathered.
Here, individuals compare views of their own performance with the behaviorally specific performance info from their colleagues manager, subordinates, and peers.
In the context, Dr. Davis invites his colleagues to attend his class and asks them give or provide feedback on his teaching methods and about engaging his students. Thus Dr Davis is trying to conduct a 360- degree feedback process.
<u>True.</u> People who use social networks tend to share similar racial, religious, age, and national origins.
<h3><u>What is ethnicity?</u></h3>
The shared characteristics of a group, such as culture, religion, language, nationality, common ancestry, and more, are essentially linked to ethnicity. It is the physical manifestation of a past shared by several cultures, which gave rise to comparable worldviews, goals, and values.
Ethnicity serves as a source of meaning and purpose for a large portion of the global population. People accept their ethnic identification based on their participation in the traditions of the group they belong to as well as their membership in the group as a whole, which appears to be primarily characterized by a shared religion and a language.
Learn more about ethnicity with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/26273889
#SPJ4
It took 3 years to build ONE Terracotta Warrior
Answer:
YES
Explanation:
Because “At no previous time has American security been as seriously threatened from without as it is today,” Roosevelt admitted, but he still had hope for a future that would encompass the “four essential human freedoms”—including freedom from fear. And when Pearl Harbor was attacked at the end of that year, news reports from the time showed that Americans indeed responded with determination more than fear.
Nearly three quarters of a century later, a poll released in December found that Americans are more fearful of terrorism than at any point since Sept. 11, 2001. And while recent events like the attacks in ISIS-inspired attacks in Paris and the fatal shootings in San Bernardino, Calif. may have Americans particularly on edge, experts say that Roosevelt’s advice has gone unheeded for sometime. “My research starts in the 1980s and goes more or less till now, and there have been very high fear levels in the U.S. continuously,” says Barry Glassner, president of Lewis & Clark college and author of The Culture of Fear: Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things.
Firm data on fear levels only go back so far, so it’s hard to isolate a turning point. Gallup polls on fear of terrorism only date to about the time of the Oklahoma City Bombing in 1995. (At that point, 42% of respondents were very or somewhat worried about terrorism; the post-9/11 high mark for that question is 59% in October of 2001, eight percentage points above last month’s number.) Other questionnaires about fear of terrorism date back to the early 1980s, following the rise of global awareness of terrorism in the previous decade, as Carl Brown of Cornell University’s Roper Center public opinion archives points out. Academics who study fear use materials like letters and newspaper articles to fill in the gaps, and those documents can provide valuable clues.
Western Europe, and especially Japan do not have an abundance of crude oil
