We cannot agree with Danika. Why? Well, The reasoning is given as follows:
Two functions are inverses of each other if and only if it is true that the composition function is given by:

Everything is ok up to this point, right?. But let's prove that this is not fulfilled for these functions, then:

<span>
As you can see we did not obtain the function that matches the definition of </span>inverse functions. For that reason <em>we can't agree with Danika</em>.
Answer:
The corresponding point is (5,8)
Step-by-step explanation:
In this problem we know that
The rule of the transformation is equal to
(x,f(x)) ------> (x,f(x)+4)
so
for the point (5,4)
x=5, f(x)=4
substitute
(5,4) ------> (5,4+4)
(5,4) ------> (5,8)
therefore
The corresponding point is (5,8)
Answer:
• For this one we need to split this problem into two equations:
• a (adults) + c (children) = 560
• 2a + c = $860
• Then we substitute 560 - a for c in the second equation.
- 2a + 560 - a = 860
- 2a + 560 = 860
- 2a = 530
- 2a = 265
• Then we plug this into the first equation:
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>I hope this helps you !! </h2>
Answer:
Let's simplify step-by-step.
(3)(3)−(19)(2)+kx−30
=9+−38+kx+−30
Combine Like Terms:
=9+−38+kx+−30
=(kx)+(9+−38+−30)
=kx+−59
Answer:
=kx−59
Answer:
-7pi √3
Step-by-step explanation:
Treating pi as a variable, the simplified value can be written as;
-7pi √3
This can be obtained from using the following simple methodology;
pi(√3 -8 √3)
= pi (-7 √3)