Answer:
The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.
The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.
It states, for instance, that
<em>"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
</em>
- <em>
protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety
</em>
- <em>prevent disorder or crime
</em>
- <em>protect health or morals
</em>
- <em>protect the rights and reputations of other people
</em>
- <em>prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence
</em>
- <em>maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"</em>
Cheers!
I would say interest groups
Answer:
Hope this helps
Explanation:
(iii) Delegated legislation is more flexible than an Act of Parliament. It can be passed quickly and easily amended or revoked, so that the law is up to date. Therefore, it allows rapid change. (iv) Delegated legislation helps in removing the difficulty clause and meet unforeseen emergencies expeditiously.
Answer:
unethical
1 what if the cookies where spiked. then what would he do?
2 if the cookies had something she was allergic to and they didn't ask
3 maybe their familie was being nice but i think the parole officer didn't trust them so led the exception to his wife to make sure
Explanation:
