The independent variable is the temperature.
The study aims to assess how the temperature level affects another variable, that, in turn, will be the dependent variable: the mood of the participants. The aim of the study is to conclude whether it is possible or not to infer causality between those two, in other words, to see whether different levels of temperature (<em>the cause</em>), trigger the emergence of a certain type of mood <em>(the effect).</em>
When we say we make an appeal to convince the audience we are making a request to the public, a serious, crucial or honest one. In this case, to move the audience (the parents) to support our case (go to school later would be easier for them), we have to talk about something that can benefit them from this change, if not they wouldn’t be interested. For example, saying that because is late it isn’t dangerous walking to school, and they wouldn’t have to drive you. In that case, they won’t even have to move from the house and have their own timetable.
Answer:
Beowulf summons even greater strength and rips Grendel's arm completely out of its socket.
Explanation:
Fatally wounded, Grendel slinks back to his swampy home to die. Back in the mead-hall, Beowulf holds up his gory trophy in triumph. (He proudly hangs the arm high on the wall of Heorot as proof of his victory.)
Answer:
B). Just as.
Explanation:
<u>Jerry M. Burger's replication to Stanley Milgram's one of the most acknowledged study and experiment on obedience propose that in comparison to people in 1970s, after fifty years of huge span of time people in 2006 were 'just as' likely to adhere to the authority' and ready to do anything asked for by the authority as they were previously.</u> His claims replicate Milgram's theory by saying that the factors explained by him are still operative. He even duplicated his proposition regarding the distinct rates of obedience among men and women. Therefore, <u>option B</u> becomes the correct answer to this question.