1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Minchanka [31]
3 years ago
5

WILL MARK BRAINLIEST Why did it take so long for monarchs to be subject to the rule of law just like everyone else? Why was Engl

and first to have a constitutional monarchy rather than an absolute monarchy?
History
1 answer:
Radda [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Why did it take so long for monarchs to be subject to the rule of law just like everyone else?

European Absolute Monarchs of the Modern Era had accumulated lots of power, starting from the Middle Ages. They had subjugated the former medieval feudal lords, and they also had the support of the Church (the Catholic Church in the case of nations like France and Spain, and Protestant Churches in the case of England).

This alliance with the Church not only gave them more political power and wealth, but also legitimacy in front of the people. Many of these monarchs, like Louis XIV, were seen almost divine.

Why was England first to have a constitutional monarchy rather than an absolute monarchy?

England had a tradition of limiting the power of the monarch that traces back to the Carta Magna of 1215.

From that moment on, the parliament always kept some form of check on the monarch.

Besides, England, along with the Netherlands, was the first European country to liberalize the economy. This economic freedom brought wealth to many merchants, tradesmen and so on, what would be known as the  

bourgeoisie.

These people began to demand political representation in the parliament, which contributed to the power decline of the English monarchs.

You might be interested in
State two reasons Lincoln did not focus on union victory in the war
kherson [118]
1) He was trying to Unite the country, no longer and south, but one country.
2)He abolished Slavery and needed the South to come to terms with this to enforce the laws.


3 0
3 years ago
Why might the English government have agreed to send debtors to the New World?
Lorico [155]

Answer:

The 3rd one

Explanation:

A. It's the complete opposite of what the article is about

B. This might be a trick question, but it's not England who needs workers, it's the colonies.

C. This is correct because it states that the colonies themselves needed workers from jails to make the economy better but this did not work out.

8 0
3 years ago
Can you labeled this for me
bezimeni [28]

here you go hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
How did the yakima wars end?
Dmitriy789 [7]
The Yakima war ended by signing the Treaty of Yakama. The tribes were given $200,000 for exchanging land.

Hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
Privately, Lincoln believed that slavery _____.
laiz [17]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

he believed that everyone was equal.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the definition of bureaucratic personality
    9·1 answer
  • Harappan civilizations were highly advanced for the time period?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the religious conflicts of the 1500's change life in europe?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the soviets choose cuba for a strategic place to send missiles​
    10·1 answer
  • Which quotation reflects the perspective of most Georgia legislators in 1956 regarding the Georgia state flag?
    5·2 answers
  • Which does not describe chinas great leap forward?
    8·1 answer
  • If you were in the army, what would you look forward to doing when you retired?
    11·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP!!!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Imagine that you were living in America during this period ( the Boston Tea Party ), suggest a different way to stop Britain fro
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement is not true of feudalism? *
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!