Answer:
part of the ammunition
Explanation:
the militia was able to hide some of their weapons and ammunition
The three things Germanic kingdoms had in common were witan, Roman influence and comitatus justice system.
Witan was a council that consisted of Anglo-Saxon kings. They decided matters such as land, problems with the church, taxes, law, succession and, defense.
Roman influence was strong in Germany and in the Germanic kingdoms, Roman’s oldest city in Germany was built in 16 B.C and it was named Augusta Treverorum. Germanic kingdoms were so deeply influenced by Romans that military kingship was based on a mix of birth status and popular consent.
At last, the comitatus justice system was a symbiotic system of protection and gain. It consisted of the protection the Lord offered the vassals in return of loyalty in battles.
The Treaty of Versailles was also the treaty that set up the League of Nations and not agreeing to it meant not being part of the League of Nations. Second, Americans did not want to risk more Americans dying in a European war, as they had in World War I.
1. Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases in which the accusation pertains to a violation of federal law, and also in cases where parties involved in a lawsuit are from different states within the US or if one of the parties is a foreign entity.
- An example of the first type would be if police officers or a police department were accused of violating the civil rights of an individual or group. This would be tried in a federal court.
- An example of the second type would be if a business owner in one state was sued by someone from another state for breach of contract or for fraudulent business practice.
2. Presidents (in general) will tend to appoint judges who align with their own views on political justice because they don't want their own attempts at leadership blocked by the courts, and also they hope to be able to leave a lasting legacy on nation overall through what they would consider favorable court decisions. Ideally, however, presidents will choose appointees for federal courts and the Supreme Court based on the overall strength of their qualifications, not merely based on political leanings they may seem to have.
3. Once a case reaches the Supreme Court, the The Supreme Court itself decides which cases it will hear.
The Supreme Court is asked to review more than 7,000 cases each year, so it would not be possible for the court to hear and make a decision on every case that is sent to it. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100 to 150 cases per year. The vast majority of those cases work their way up to the Supreme Court from lower courts. About two-thirds of the cases come from lower federal court decisions that are appealed for review, and about one-third of the cases are reviewing decisions made by supreme courts of individual states.
There are some cases that can have original jurisdiction at the Supreme Court level -- such as when there is a case between one state government and another or between state governments and the federal government. These are more rare within the overall agenda of the Court.
Answer:
The Democratic Party supports national education standards for elementary, middle, and high schools in the United States. This party also supports more federal control of the education system, and more funding.
As for College education, the Democratic Party supports more funding for state colleges, more scholarships, and some factions of the Party support student loan forgiveness.
The Republican Party supports state or local standards for school, they dislike the idea of more federal control, and many in the party support the system of vouchers, in which schools are not funded by the government, but students are instead given money to enroll in a school of their choice.
We can see that the Democratic Party is in favor of more funding and more federal control, while the Republican Party is favor of less funding and less federal control.