A paradox is a statement or a concept that seems to be self-contradictory. In Logic, a paradox is a statement that contradicts itself. In everyday language, a paradoxical statement might only seem contradictory, it could be a sound. For example:<span>I always lie. (Logic)(This would be accepted as a paradox in the Logic arena. If it's true, then it's not true.)</span>
1. The answer to the question is the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. It gave United States President Lyndon Johnson an authorization (although not a formal one) to use conventional military force in the Southeast Asia.
2. The women joined the struggle for equal rights. They wanted to have equal opportunities like the ones given to the men.
3. In northern part, the problems were more focused on economic competitions between Whites and Blacks. In southern part, the problems were more focused on legal issues.
The Industrial Revolution promoted new technologies in production that replaced human labor. Together with this, the industrial mode of production is developing, more and more factories with large plants are growing. The need for workers is high, so migration of population from village to city is recorded, more and more labor is in search of a job that can bring a stable income. This creates a large number of workforce, even more than needed, so workers are willing to do anything, even for a lower hourly rate. Employers have the opportunity to reduce the hourly rate due to over-labor supply, and so they can pay less for women and children under unequal treatment between men and women, especially children. People are fundamentally blackmailed to work for a low hourly rate because there was always workforce available. The conclusion is that, in the conditions of industrial production, only employers could earn more on the basis of the use of excess worker value, while workers earned less on behalf of employers' profits.
They felt more powerfull during the war dur to the ffactire that they had alot more people to fight and their weapons were more advanced