Answer: No.
Explanation: I think Ponyboy never wanted to fight in the rumble because he hates violence. He was being there for his family.
Based on the information in the article, the author believes e-books are better than print books.
<h3>What is the article about?</h3>
The article makes a comparison between printed and e-books.
<h3>What is the positon of the author about this topic?</h3>
The author supports the idea e-books are better as he explains:
- E-books are environmentally friendly.
- E-books give you tips to read.
- E-books save space.
Note: This question is incomplete because the article is not given; here is the complete question:
Question:
According to the article, the author believes_______
Options:
- E-books are better than print books.
- E-books and print books are both ecologically friendly.
- Print books are better than e-books.
- E-books and print books both have advantages and disadvantages, so most readers use both.
Article:
So now you know what an e-reader is. But you still may be wondering why they put printed books to shame. E-readers are superior to printed books because they save space, are environmentally friendly, and provide helpful reading tips and tools that printed books do not.
E-readers are superior to printed books because they save space. The average e-reader can store thousands of digital books, providing a veritable library at your fingertips. What is more, being the size and weight of a thin hardback, the e-reader itself is relatively petite. It is easy to hold and can fit in a pocketbook or briefcase easily. This makes handling ponderous behemoths such as War and Peace, Anna Karenina, and Les Misérables a breeze. Perhaps the only drawback to the space-saving aspect of an e-reader is that it requires you to find new things to put on your shelves.
Learn more about E-books in: brainly.com/question/8586030
#SPJ1
Number 3 would be the only logical choice in my opinion because everything else would be in a narrative or story of some sort. Expository essays are exclusively informational.
Answer: Adam Smith would have disagreed with this statement. He believed government should not regulate the economy or control trade.
Explanation:
Even though Adam Smith believed that the government had a role to play in the economy, he believed that this role should be limited to National defense, upholding civil law and providing public services like education.
He would therefore be against the government regulating trade agreements that allow the passage of goods and services into and out of the country. Karl Marx and John Maynard Keynes on the other hand, advocated for government intervention, albeit in varying quantities.
