1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
guapka [62]
3 years ago
12

Why did the U.S join World War 1

History
1 answer:
Simora [160]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The U.S. entered World War because Germany embarked on a deadly gamble. Germany sank many American merchant ships around the British Isles which prompted the American entry into the war.

You might be interested in
What might have been one consequence had the Federalist papers not<br> been published?
Delicious77 [7]
The 85 essays succeeded by helping to persuade doubtful New Yorkers to ratify the Constitution. Today, The Federalist Papers helps us to more clearly understand what the writers of the Constitution had in mind when they drafted that amazing document 200 years ago. So it would have done the opposite of all of what I just said essentially
3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is not a true statement about the inca?
Likurg_2 [28]

d. they built cities and fortresses on highlands of Andes Mountian

4 0
3 years ago
Cortez and pizzaro are leader who were known as
zubka84 [21]
They were known as a fundamental difference between European.
8 0
3 years ago
In texas, as well as most states, the temporary party organization occurs in three stages during "off-year" elections: the preci
hammer [34]
The appropriate response is National Nominating Convention. It's the fantastic prologue to a political gathering's possibility for president. In some cases this is the point at which the bad habit presidential candidate is picked, also. A legislator may even give an energizing discourse that turns into the discussion of the nation. We'll investigate exactly how national selecting traditions function and how they've changed.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP WILL MARK YOU AS BRAINLEST
tangare [24]

I fully approve the idea of creating a legislative branch with two houses. First if we'd had only one house how would the states have been represented? By population? In that case the states with the largest populations would have all legislated solely in their benefit and often to the detriment of the states with smaller populations. Ok so we create a legislative branch with one house based only on equal representation of each state right? But the problem here is representation would then be of the state but we the people for of and by whom the government was being formed would have no direct voice in the legislative branch. A government that is directly responsive only to the people can devolve into rule by the mob such as we saw happen in France following their revolution. They had a unicameral legislative government the house of deputies and it was directly responsive to the people giving way to rule by the mob and the horrors that bred the reign of terror with thousands of people beheaded including children accused of being counter revolutionaries. There was no senior house to temper if you will the will of the people or take a longer view if you will of whats best for the nation as a whole. Our House of Representatives is suppose to be more parochial in its view they represent our will (or rather they are suppose to) the Senate is given a longer term and originally they were not elected by the people of their states but rather depending on the state either elected by the state's legislative branches or directly appointed by the state's Governor. US Senators as that house was originally constituted were suppose to be somewhat more independent from the people although not completely independent because they worked for the state not the people but the people to whom they were accountable were elected by the people of the state. During President Wilson's term in office he pushed for and got an amendment that made the US Senate (to his way of thinking more democratic). I personally think it reduced the US Senate to being more political by making the Senators more directly accountable to the people. More democracy is not always desirable as we can see from the experience of France and her reign of terror.  

I read a biography of John Adams this past summer. John Adams was the man who first pushed for a written Declaration of Independence and then after the Revolutionary War was over and he was a commissioner/ambassador from the United States to France and then England while the United States was operating and failing rapidly under the Articles of Confederation he pushed very hard for a bicameral legislative branch so the will of the people could be balanced by the long term good of the nation in the Senate. He was excoriated by Thomas Jefferson whom he'd been friends with if Jefferson ever really had friends for using the English parliment as his model for a legislative branch of government. Jefferson was in love with everything French and only disavowed the French Revolution long after the horrors of madame le gillotine and the reign of terror made it clear that the will of the mob needed to be tempered by cooler more rational minds who yes tended to be more conservative in their actions.  

I come from West Virginia we have barely 3 million citizens. We have three congressional representatives. New York for example has what forty six congressional representatives how could we feel comfortable knowing that we depend soley on the good will of larger states when questions before congress are being decided by large states only and the consequences of those decisions might fall soley upon the smaller states simply because they have essentially no voice in congress because of their small congressional delegations? A bicameral government not only protects the nation from being whipsawed by a very parochial house of representatives but the small states are protected at least somewhat each state being equally represented in the US Senate which is charged with being more concerned with what is best for the country than they are about what may be temporarily best for the citizens in their own states.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Schlieffen Plan was designed by the German military to
    10·1 answer
  • Trench warfare resulted in a stalemate on the Western Front, as it is almost impossible to advance and capture enemies trench
    12·1 answer
  • Why was the Virginia Plan introduced and amended and the New Jersey Plan introduced and rejected?
    8·2 answers
  • How many presidents was there
    15·2 answers
  • The Ziggurat at Ur was a (2 points)
    6·1 answer
  • Why is Herbert hoover important in WWI<br><br> Need help please???????????!!!!!!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Is this statement true or false? Vast, grassy plains known as pampas cover much of northern Venezuela. true false
    15·1 answer
  • What are 3 interesting “fun” facts about the Korean War?
    13·2 answers
  • Name two artist talked about in yesterday's slideshow about the Renaissance.
    6·1 answer
  • 3 examples of media in south Africa ​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!