Answer:
the answer is A, your are agreeing to a drug test if your are ever suspected of a DUI
Explanation:
The main danger of driving is drunk driving and to combat that, its better to have some one give implied consent since it'll save lives
Answer:
(a)- Speech that constitutes a direct personal provocation.
Explanation:
The first constitutional amendment refers to freedom of expression, religious freedom and the prohibition of censorship. This amendment also states that the entire population is free to make any demonstration and protest to any governmental sphere and any ruler, provided it is a peaceful protest. Based on this, we can say that the first constitutional amendment prohibits the formation of a clergy to offer non-denominational prayers in public high school formations, polygamy, as long as it is part of traditional religious practice and the establishment of schools to require Jehovah's Witnesses salute the flag Schools exempt Amish children from public education requirements
.
However, the first amendment allows a speech to be given that constitutes a direct personal provocation.
Answer:
B. Seep's is not liable because Abel didn't act within the scope of his employment.
Explanation:
According to the facts, Abel is a rightful employee of Seep Corporation. And he also has a duty to preserve the interest of his employer.
But at the same time, his act of beating up and assaulting Johnny was done outside of the jurisdiction of his working hours. And as such, he wasn't covered in the company's rule of using <em>"force to keep intruders from climbing the fence to enter the plant"</em>. Moreover, the personal attack that Johnny had done on him makes this assault personal. So, Abel's attack on Johnny has nothing to do with the company he works for, and the Corporation is not liable for any charges or damages that their employee had done outside of his 'employment' hours.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is option B.
</u>
