Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
just because we have language barrier doesn't mean we have view someone differently
Answer:
they animals is in cages so they won't get to kill u I don't know
I would check all of them they all do
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
Debates in the US Congress allow certain members of the Congress to state their objections to certain parts of a proposed bill.
