Opinion change resulting from a thoughtful focus on the content of arguments illustrates <u>"central route persuasion".</u>
<u></u>
The central route to persuasion comprises of thoughtful consideration of the contentions (thoughts, content) of the message. At the point when a recipient is doing central processing, the person is being a functioning member during the process of persuasion. The central route to persuasion happens when an individual is induced to act dependent on the arguments or the content of the message.
Any particular siege?
Basically, a siege could have to principals outcomes: either the enemy gave up, being tired and lacking food and other resources, or the sieged place fell, either because they had to give up due to running out of food or by being attached and directly overpowered.
The answer to this question is the release of GABA. Gaba or
gamma aminobutyric acid is a substance that is found in plants that is used as
a medicine or supplement to those patients that are suffering from anxiety and it
also slows downs signals in the nerves.
Answer:
high-context; low-context
Explanation:
Audience members who place more importance on nonverbal than verbal messages from a speaker might be from high-context cultures.
People from high-context cultures have highly collectivistic beliefs. Here mutual respect and businesses are done by building up relationships with each other and maintains respectful communication. People from High context cultures belief in interpersonal relationships. They give more importance to non verbal communications in the form of body language and gestures, behaviors and character.
Whereas those placing more emphasis on what was said than the nonverbal messages might be from low-context cultures.
In low context cultures, a lot of information is exchange through direct talks and communication. People from low context cultures follow direct rules and maintains standards. They are task oriented and have short term relationship.
Thus the answer is "high-context" and "low-context".
I believe the answer is: read the novel aloud and discuss it with the students who struggle
When readers struggle to read they are very likely to stop reading it and making an opinion that the writing is bad and does not make sense. By making them read in group setting the readers would most likely realize why they do not understand it and it open up opportunities for exchange of opinion and idea among the group.
