1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lynna [10]
3 years ago
11

Someone who references passage 10 citing L'Ouverture's attention to the surveillance of foreigners in the Haitian colony in 1801

to argue that
immigration policy in the United States in the twenty-first century reflects these same concerns would be:

-Offering an ad hominem argument

-Presenting relevant evidence

-Making a historical testimonial

-Reasoning by analogy



A historian who rejects L'Ouverture's account of Haitian society merely because he died in a French prison would be:

-Committing a teleological fallacy

-Engaging in causal reasoning

-Making a generalization

-Offering an ad hominem argument


A historian who uses L'Ouverture's Dictatorial Proclamation as evidence to reason backward to determine the socioeconomic factors at work in this
time period would be:

-Offering an ad hominem argument

-Committing a teleological fallacy

-Reasoning from a lack of evidence

-Engaging in causal reasoning
History
1 answer:
Ierofanga [76]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Someone who references passage 10 citing L'Ouverture's attention to the surveillance of foreigners in the Haitian colony in 1801 to argue that

immigration policy in the United States in the twenty-first century reflects these same concerns would be:

-Reasoning by analogy

A historian who rejects L'Ouverture's account of Haitian society merely because he died in a French prison would be:

-Offering an ad hominem argument

A historian who uses L'Ouverture's Dictatorial Proclamation as evidence to reason backward to determine the socioeconomic factors at work in this  time period would be:

-Engaging in causal reasoning

Explanation:

Reasoning by analogy involves reaching some conclusions from examples of similar events.  Analogical arguments establish the similarities between what is true about two things, events, or points of argument.  An ad hominem argument takes advantage of the opponent's feelings and interests without sticking to general principles.  A causal reasoning establishes a relationship between a cause and its effect.

You might be interested in
Please Help ASAP
Sliva [168]
<span>Sand dunes can encroach on human habitats. Sand dunes move through a few different means, all of them assisted by wind. One way that dunes can move is through saltation, where sand particles skip along the ground like a rock thrown across a pond might skip across the water's surface. When these skipping particles land, they may knock into other particles and cause them to skip as well. With slightly stronger winds, particles collide in mid-air, causing sheet flows. In a major dust storm, dunes may move tens of meters through such sheet flows. And like snow, sand avalanches, falling down the steep slopes of the dunes that face away from the winds, also moving the dunes forward. 
</span>

I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
4 0
3 years ago
Who did the enlightenment identify as the problem solvers in society?
prohojiy [21]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

because they are ones that help more because 1 we dont have a "king" 2 we have had issues with the government itself

7 0
3 years ago
Match each viewpoint to the correct leader 100 POINTS!!!
beks73 [17]

Abraham lincoln

-believed slavery was a moral issue

Stephen douglas

-opposed kansas nebraska act

-introduced the kansas nebraska act

I only dont know the one of who wanted to allow slavery to continue but hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the capital of China
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

Beijing

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Constitution set up a set of checks and balances among the three branches of government. Explain at least one specific way t
Dmitrij [34]

The constitution of the United States set up a set of checks and balances among the three branches of government. The Legislative, Executive and Judicial powers constitute the structure of the american government, and they have power to check each other's way of work.

One example of the check and balance system is that the Supreme court of the United States may check congress by declaring a law passed by this one as unconstitutional. This is a clear check limit used against the legislative power, that is the congress. But on the other hand, the power is balanced because the members of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President of the country (the Executive power), and to be appointed they have to be approved by the Congress.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Prior to the industrial revolution what was coal used for
    9·1 answer
  • After Caesar's assassination, his heir Octavian took the throne, became the first emperor, and titled himself __________________
    12·1 answer
  • Why was slavery used in North America?
    14·1 answer
  • Hehe! Fun fact the Mona Lisa has no eyebrows!
    5·1 answer
  • BANSANG SINILANGAN,
    7·2 answers
  • 2. What were the main reasons for the failure of Mao's Great Leap Forward?
    5·1 answer
  • HELP PLS.!!!!<br><br> #A.S.A.P
    5·1 answer
  • Which early American leader did not
    5·1 answer
  • Ventilation has always been an issue in underground mines.<br><br> True<br> False
    9·1 answer
  • What common features do the Ehrenreich's see in the unrest in the United States and Western Europe in 1968
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!