The answer is "legitimate purpose".
<span>Among the potential components influencing survey response, three of them are the subject of the survey, who is sponsoring the survey, as seeing some credible source can enhance the respondent's willingness to answer questions, and the survey provider, are the essential determinants.
</span>
The correct answer is a mixed economy.
A Mixed Economy is one where there is a mix of private and public enterprises present. Since the question indicated that there are private enterprises as well as public transportation and electricity, this is an example of a mixed economy.
Answer:
The trustee can stop Alex from selling the house and that automatically prevent the transfer of ownership from Alex to his brother Jonah.
Explanation:
The trustee will refute the transfer and take back the house as part of Alex's estate. The reason for this is not far fetched, Alex actions in this regards is tantamount to an abuse of chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy law. In that case, the trustees can use the "means test" to determine his actions and can stop the transfer of ownership to his brother, Jonah.
Because of people like Alex, US trustees has achieved a regulatory system most creditor friendly commentators have consistently espoused, which is a formal means test for Chapter 7. (The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) has clarified this area of concern.
Cristopher Mc Candless had a chaotic childhood,marked by a stormy relation between his parents,with a physically and mentally abusive condition,due to frequent differences throughout his parent´s marriage. He lived in a violent home,where his father beat and disparaged his mother, a dark reality that Christopher and his sister were forced to conceal.
His anger might be justified considering the repressed feelings during his childhood and adolescence but the final decision was somehow disproportioned and solved nothing.
The answer is that adjusting to the end of the commodity boom, which benefited South America particularly, has taken longer than expected. Between 2003 and 2010 China’s industrialisation boosted demand for minerals, oil and foodstuffs. Commodity prices fell steadily between 2010 and 2015. As export revenue shrank, the region’s currencies weakened, curbing imports and pushing up inflation.
Latin America also faces a fiscal squeeze. The commodity boom temporarily boosted tax revenues. Too many governments spent, rather than invested or saved, this windfall. The primary fiscal deficit (ie, before interest payments) in the region as a whole increased from 0.2% of GDP in 2013 to 2.6% last year. In other words, public debt is rising. Many governments have started to retrench. Few are in a position to prime the pump of recovery.
