Witch of the following was not a motive for imperialism in the nineteenth century? To expand the territory of western nations.

1 answer:

7 0

To offer medical assistance to Third World countries.

The imperialism movement of the 19th century did not show particular concern for the native peoples in the regions they came to control through imperialistic means. There were medical missions and religious missions that accompanied the imperialistic advance into other countries, but those were factors that accompanied the imperialistic advance more than they motivated it.
Also, as a false component of that option, the term "Third World" didn't come into existence until the era of the Cold War. The "Third World" referred to the developing nations that did not align with either of the superpowers, the USA or the USSR. No one was using the term "Third World" in the 19th century.

You might be interested in

Why was the pizza yello

AlekseyPX

Answer: Because they put cheese!

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How would the creation of a constiution affect louis XVI power

kupik [55]

beacuse it was to much for the power grid at a time

8 0

3 years ago

Question 5 of 5

Contact [7]

Answer: Choice C.

They worried that Lincoln would try to end slavery in the United States.

==========================================================

Explanation:

The issue of slavery was debated and fought over for many years before the election of 1860. It was only until Lincoln became president that sparked the southern states to secede, which led to the Civil War. Proof of this is found in the many Declaration of Secession documents produced by each state that left the union. This is basically a document explaining why they left the United States to form the Confederate States of America (CSA) aka the Confederacy.

In modern times, some people mistakenly claim that the Civil War wasn't over slavery but rather states' rights. This is simply false. The documents I mentioned prove that slavery was the core issue. More proof is the various states having issues with the fugitive slave act, in that the northern states didn't really adhere to the law to the level of the southern states' liking. I guess you could argue that states' rights were involved, but specifically the south fought to have the right to own slaves. In short, it's all about getting the correct context. Expanding that context, simply look at the decades preceding the war and notice all of the tension involving whether a new state was a free state vs a slave state.

8 0

1 year ago

Abcdefhijklmnopqrstuvwxyz<br> abcdefghjklmnopqrstuvwxyz<br> abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

i dont understand

Explanation:

European empires became less concerned with spreading Christianity and western beliefs. European empires began to implement more tolerant policies towards other racial groups

6 0

2 years ago

Which statements about characteristics of the inca's civilization are correct choose all that are correct.

satela [25.4K]

The correct answers are B and D.

B) The Inca road system, known in Quechua language as <em>Qhapaq Ñan</em>, was the largest transportation system in Pre-Columbian South America. It connected important nodes of the Inca Empire following the Andes, from the North in what today is Colombia to the South in what today is Argentina.

D) They also built large stone cities in the Andes mountains, the most famous one among them was Machu Picchu, which is made completely out of giant blocks of stone fitted to each other without mortar.

4 0

2 years ago