Thanks for your question!
The answer is Jainism
Hope this helps!
<span>(1) No two people agree on just what would be "fair".
(2) Even if there were agreement, the people with political clout have no reason to want a "fair" system; they want a system that benefits them. There is a reason the Republicans have been pushing through tax cuts for the rich.
(3) The tax "system" includes all the taxes: local, state, and federal. If you want the entire system to be fair, it has to be changed as a whole, not piece by piece. And that would make it hard to start and hard to maintain (any change in tax rates would also have to be coordinated) </span>
Answer:
C) regulating internet usage
Explanation:
Implied power is a form of power in which it is believed to be in the jurisdiction of the United States Congress to perform but the United States Constitution does not explicitly or outright stated.
The Article 1 to 5 of the United States Constitution explicitly states the power of the US Congress and it includes: signing a peace treaty, proposing an amendment to the Constitution, coining a new twenty-five cent coin.
However, the power of the congress to "regulating internet usage, " is not outrightly stated in the Constitution, hence it is a good example of Implied power because it is relatively be inferred to align with express powers, though not outrightly stated.
The protective tariff was an economic cause of the increased tension between the North and the South.
Economically, the North had a lot of factories and had become industrialized. The south on the other hand still depended heavily on Agriculture.
High protective tariffs were placed on foreign goods to favor the Northern Industries. This meant that people had to buy more from the North.
This tariff favored the North but caused greater burden on the South who had to pay more for goods that they imported from Europe.
In conclusion the protective tariffs helped to boost the economy in the North while hurting t the south.
read more on brainly.com/question/24380171?referrer=searchResults
The correct answer is:
It allowed and encouraged the recruitment of blacks to be soldiers for the U
forces.
Explanation:
It allowed forces to recruit the black males in the Union for the army in that there were many black leaders who were also in favor of this so that there was a possible emancipation of the black population.
They could fight for their own race's right to be free and this would have also given them good monetary recompenses.
This meant that fighting in the war would have given them a better lifestyle after the war and a better life to look forward to.
