Answer:
I would say dear auntie I have lost the right to watch television and I need your help to get that right back. If you help me I can do chores around your house and I can help you go grocery shopping.
Explanation:
It´s hard to find something to do for your aunt other than maybe chores or other stuff like that so I guess those could go hand in hand.
<u>Answer:</u>
Option E. One quality of a good research question is that it provides specific details of the context.
<u>Explanation:</u>
It is very important that the person who is required to answer the question understands it well otherwise the answer will not help the researcher. For example, if the researcher is researching ‘teenagers’, the question needs to specify what aspect is being referred to. Is it their behaviour with peers, with teachers or with parents or is it their attitude towards particular things?
For instance, a research question can be framed as :
What is the attitude of teenagers towards their peers in school? Unless the question is detailed well, the answer will not meet the expectations of the researcher.
Answer:
1. My mum is easy to talk to. Talk to (b) <u>her</u>.
2. My dad's great. You'll love (e) <u>him</u>.
3. We're lost. Can you help (d) <u>us</u>?
4. Listen, I've got something to tell (c) <u>you</u>.
5. Beata has got five dogs. She really loves (a) <u>them</u>.
6. Hey, Jack - I need to talk to (g) <u>you</u>.
7. This is a great CD. What is (f)<u> it</u>?
Explanation:
I have been able to match the sentences to their object pronouns.
Object pronouns are known to be those pronouns that replaces noun in a sentence and are the objects that receive the action in that sentence.
In a sentence, if the object pronouns replace nouns, the nouns they replace cannot be the subject of that sentence. These object pronouns are known to be personal pronouns which are used as grammatical object. They are used as the direct or indirect object of a verb or can be used as the object of a preposition.
Some examples are <em>me, you, him, her, us, it,</em> etc.
Answer:
The correct answer is 1. incomplete comparison.
Explanation:
In the example, there can certainly exist a logical relation between the two propositions (inquisitive students - make - better students), however, since there is not enough information, a logical relation between them cannot be properly constructed. If the comparison presented some sort of argument then it would be complete. For instance: "Inquisitive children, <em>since they are more curious and open to learning</em>, make better students". Without the argument, the idea seems more like an unsustained opinion, based on prejudice, than anything else.
The answer to this question is b
