Answer:
A united nation with slavery abolished
Why?
We can easily take out,two nations, one with slavery and one without, and, a united nation with slavery only in the South. This is because after the civil war there was no slavery as it abolished. We can eliminate,a united nation with a new system of government, because our government did not change, only the laws. This being, a united nation with slavery abolished, is the answer because our nation was one united again and slavery was abolished.
Answer:
On March 3, 1931, President Herbert Hoover signed a law that made "The ... of food and supplies to citizens of Belgium after that country was overrun by Germany. ... Many people were forced to wait in bread lines for food and to live in squalid shantytowns known derisively as Hoovervilles.
Explanation:
Hoover's response to the crisis was constrained by his conservative political philosophy. He believed in a limited role for government and worried that excessive federal intervention posed a threat to capitalism and individualism. He felt that assistance should be handled on a local, voluntary basis.
A colonial meeting house was a meeting house used in colonial New England built using tax money. The colonial meeting house was the focal point of the community where all the town's residents could discuss local issues, conduct religious worship, and engage in town business.
Cyanobacteria use water, carbon dioxide, and sunlight to create their food, and expel oxygen as a by-product. The real significance of stromatolites is that they are the earliest fossil evidence of life on Earth. ... They were the first known organisms to photosynthesis and produce free oxygen.
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
-Goebbels says he favors "rule by the best." Do you think he clearly defines what he means by "the best"?
I think that Goebbels does not clearly define his term, but the reader can understand that the strong dictators are the ones that are best suited to rule the people.
I can cite a specific detail from the text to support my answer. It would be the paragraph that says "A minority, if it includes the best, will turn the German fate."
-I think Goebbel's real passion here is to defend the idea of "rule by the best." However, he takes his chances to critique democracy.
A specific example of his language and rhetoric would be this: "The people have the choice to live under the open dictatorship of the courageous or to die under the hypocritical democracy of cowards."
Joseph Goebbels was the ideologist during Adolph Hitlers' leadership. He was the master of propaganda that helped Hitler to become the kind of leader he was, conveying the proper propaganda to convince the German people.
