This excerpt comes from the story “<u><em>The Crab that Played by the Sea”</em></u> written by Rudyard Kipling. It is a fable to teach children about the origin of life.
Question: Which evidence best supports the conclusion that the narrator is telling this story with a particular child in mind?
Answer: D. “Pau Amma’s babies hate being taken out of their little Pusat Taseks and brought home in pickle-bottles. That is why they nip you with their scissors, and it serves you right!”
Declarative if i am not mistaken
Answer: I read the book about dogs
the two sentences that best describe this passage are "being around pets benefits kids who need to learn responsibility." and "a study by the University of California found that reading to dogs improved third graders' reading skills."
together these two sentences sum up all of the ideas in the article and explain all of the benefits described. the second sentence sums up the majority of the article and choosing the one about improving a children's ability to learn would be repetitive. and the other about it being good for the teachers isn't mentioned in the article at all.
the study is the most important part of the passage and covers pretty much the entire beginning of it. the responsibility was kind of added in as a "hey this is a thing too" but it really showcases how beneficial the dogs are to kids and that's what the message of the article is
Explanation:
Hope this helps you!!!!! :D
"The True Conception of Empire" is actually a book that was written by Joseph <span>Chamberlain. And based on this book, what the author sees as the national mission or goal of Britain is to make their country [Britain] a world power and the answer to this would be option B. Hope this helps.</span>
Peeta doesn't want to be 'a piece' in the Hunger Games, and he wants to die the same person he is now. He doesnt want the Games to change him.
