Answer:
don't no<em><u> </u></em><em><u>for</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>he</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>app</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>vapru</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>naga</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>he</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>app</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>bakwas</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>ahe</u></em>
Answer:b
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
"Variable interval" is the right solution.
Step-by-step explanation:
- A variable-interval timetable seems to be a fiber-reinforced routine where another sensitivity or reaction would be commended because an unanticipated or unstable transaction has taken place, which would be the exact reverse of either a fixed-interval routine.
- The whole such schedule results in a slow or predictable, fairly constant targeted respondents.
Answer:
16 holes in ones
Step-by-step explanation:
I just did the guiz and got that one right
The first one is 2,314,572,763 the other one is 7,156,134,563
