1) Why did you come to Marion's party? Had you been invited?
2) The meeting was so chaotic. Had it been planned by anyone?
3) How long had the body been frozen before the scientists found it?
4) Had the man been known to the police when he turned up in the town?
5) How many times had your application been rejected before you succeeded?
6) Why did you take your raincoat? Had rainy weather been forecast | forecasted?
7) Had the parcel just been delivered when I arrived?
8) How long had it been forbidden before it was allowed again?
9) Why did the police arrive along with the firemen? Had the house been set on fire?
10) I didn't get the money on Friday. Had it been sent a long time before that?
<h2>
I hope I helped you ^_^</h2>
Answer:from which country the answer is from
Explanation:
The correct answer should be Find the meaning of the word "terminating" in an online dictionary.
Finding it in an online dictionary would be rather easy and quick, while it would also be the most correct since the world does not have a polysemic meaning in this context. Context can be tricky while finding antonyms would not be that useful.
Answer:
The argument is not sound; the author uses an either-or argument.
Explanation:
"If your work is first with you, and your fee second, work is your master."
The answer is the last one, D. All of the other transitions indicate that the writer will either go into further detail on the subject or list other reasons as to why this would be correct. However, D clearly uses a contrasting transition to introduce a new argument.