<span>B Experts today estimate 20,000-30,000 laborers worked on the pyramid at any one time.
This is the best option out of all the options. The statement should support the idea that many people were needed to build the pyramid. Options A and C do not really indicate the amount of people the were necessary to build the pyramid. B and D are the only ones that give numbers. Option D however is not correct because even though it says that the work crews needed to be divided into smaller groups, it doesn't give a true indication of the sheer amount of workers needed. Option B is a clear estimate of the tens of thousands of workers necessary to build a pyramid.
</span>
The tense is all mixed up, but it looks like present is used most often, so "emitted" should be changed to "emits" and "pulled" should be changed to "pulls." I can't see the entire paragraph so just make sure that's consistent.
You don't need a comma in "running towards us with the fire extinguisher."
"Your mother and me" should be "Your mother and I." For reference try taking our "your mother" - it sounds pretty silly to say "me thinks" unless you're in the 1600s, right? And it should be "think" instead of "thinks."
Answer:
depends on what the situation is.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. They value cattle and identify as cattle herders.
B. They rely heavily on the weather.
E. They take responsibility for the care, feeding, and protection of animals.
F. They include cattle in their spiritual and community rituals.
Explanation:
Answer:
Deductive logic
Explanation:
The Cognitive development theory of Jean Piaget suggests that there are four stages through which a child develops mentally.
The fourth or the last stage of the theory is the Formal Operational Stage. <u>This occurs at the age of 12 and above. In this stage, a child develops through certain skills such as </u><u>systematic planning</u><u>, </u><u>deductive reasoning</u><u>, etc</u>.
According to Piaget, deductive logic or reasoning is a type of reasoning that involves using of general statement or hypothesis to reach a particular outcome.
The sentence given in the question is an example of deductive reasoning.
<u>The general statement is </u><u><em>"if all people are equal" </em></u><u>and the outcome abstracted from this general statement is </u><u><em>"then you and I must be equal."</em></u>
So, the correct answer is deductive reasoning.
