Answer:
GDP = $14,755.1 and expenditure approach
Explanation:
The formula to compute the GDP is shown below:
GDP = Personal consumption expenditures + Gross private domestic investment + Government consumption expenditures and gross investment + Net exports
where,
Net exports = Exports - imports
= $1,935.3 - $2,435.5
= -$500.2
So, the GDP is
= $10,417.1 + $1,818 + $3,020.2 - $500.2
= $14,755.1
And, the summing of all this items which are shown above while calculating the GDP is known as expenditure approach
Answer:
1,048,576 bytes
Explanation:
1 MB = 1048576 bytes
This is how the conversion works;
1 MB = 1024 kilo bytes
1 KB = 1024 bytes
1 MB = 1024* 1024 = 1048576
So, that's how it work it is not 1000 as many believe it's 1024. So the conversion is done as written above. Many people confuse it that 1 MB is equal to 1000 KB which is not true. it is equal to 1024 KB
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Start tracking your spending habits.
2.Get on a budget.
3. Re-evaluate your subscriptions.
4. Reduce electricity use.
5.Lower your housing expenses.
6. Consolidate your debt and lower interest rates.
7.Reduce your insurance premiums
8. Eat at home.
The internet links the Earth's economies.
Answer:
a. 1. You would want the regulatory boards to see more competition, so you would argue that the relevant market is all toys, which is as broad as possible. This would make it less likely that the merger would violate merger guidelines.
b. 2. You would want to use the narrowest definition of the market, which would be dolls. This would make it more likely that the merger would violate merger guidelines.
Explanation:
a. In order to avoid anti-trust laws, it would be best that Mattel convinces the authorities that the relevant category is all toys not just a subsection. This will show that the toys made by the new company would have a lot of competition from other toy makers across the board which would reduce their chances of being a monopoly and violate merger guidelines.
b. As the bid is unsolicited, Hasbro might want to defend against it. In which case their strategy should be the exact opposite of that of Mattel and they should try to convince the regulatory boards that they would be in the narrowest of markets which would be dolls. This would mean that the merger has a strong chance of leading to a monopoly and would violate merger guidelines.
