Answer:
The local government issues a limited number of restaurant licenses every year. (A)
Explanation:
Bertha claims that the burgers sold by Luke's Express Diner are priced a bit too high, because they enjoy monopoly power in the town; hence with the local government issuance of a limited number of restaurant licenses every year, this will break the monopoly that Luke's Express Dinner enjoy, thus weakening Bertha's arguments.
Answer: April 2024
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, at a minimum, the appraiser must retain his workfile till April 2024.
It should be noted that appraisal records should be kept for at least a period of 5 years. In a situation whereby there is a report which is involved in the litigation, then such file must be maintained for a further two years. This is according to the Uniform Standards for Professional Appraisal Practice Record Keeping Rule.
Answer: B. CONFLICT PERSPECTIVE
Explanation:
CONFLICT PERSPECTIVE
This theory which was opined by Karl Marx suggests that society keeps competing for limited resources and as such is in continuous conflict.
According to this theory, individuals and groups within society work to maximize their benefits and hold onto wealth by any means necessary including the disregard of the health and safety of athletes in this scenario.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
$1,550
Explanation:
Given that
Price tag = $620
Discount percentage = 60%
By taking the information,
The computation of the suit original price equal to
= Price tag ÷ (1 - discount percentage)
= $620 ÷ (1 - 0.60)
= $620 ÷ 0.40
= $1,550
Therefore, the suit original price is $1,550 after considering the discount percentage and the price tag.
