South Carolina was a state controlled by slaveholding planters where slaves were a majority of the population, worried that the same federal authority used to impose tariffs might ultimately be used to end slavery. If Congress could create taxes to benefit northern industries, the governor of South Carolina claimed, it could also outlaw slavery.
In November 1832 a South Carolina state convention adopted an ordinance of nullification repudiated two federal tariffs designed to protect the northern industries. In this action against the federal forces, South Carolina stood alone since most of the southern expressed sympathy but none endorsed nullification.
President Andrew Jackson sent federal soldiers to South Carolina, where the nullifies mobilized the state militia. In 1833 the president requested from Congress a "force bill" authorizing him to use the army, and, at the same time, he supported a bill in the Congress that would have lowered tariff duties substantially within two years.
On March 1, 1833, Congress passed the agreement tariff and the force bill, and the next day Jackson signaled both. Both sides were able to claim victory. Jackson had supported the supremacy of the Union, and South Carolina had defended a reduction of the federal tariff.
Answer:
I dont know if this is an optional choice question if so this is probabaly wrong on the ABCD scale so you can report this but otherwise if not:
People make up there mind with the knowledge of there own opinions and what <em>is</em><em> </em>factual to them so to change there minds is because it is based on other peoples opinions and this makes sense ( the easiest way to explain it is as if its a filter going through this persons brain and them identifying if this is factual to them or not in <em>their</em> opinion) to them so, after they go through this process of <em>proving</em> this other information that they held so kindly to there truth, <em>wrong</em> this suddenly changes there mind. By what they think is factual enough to believe <em>at least to them. </em><em>It</em><em> </em><em>can</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>diffe</em><em>rent</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>everyone</em><em> </em><em>else</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Answer:
the achievements of individuals who have worked to create wealth for themselves
Do you mean counter reformation? Then it's Pope Paul III
The booming industrial economy in urban areas drew millions of immigrants to the US after the Civil War.
or the fear of catholicism
