All categories

3 years ago

Help me pls I need a good grade

Mathematics

2 answers:

Simora [160]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

it is number 3

Step-by-step explanation:

sdas [7]3 years ago

7 0

It would be number 3) Rice

You might be interested in

The structure of a two-factor study can be presented as a matrix with the levels of one factor determining the rows and the leve

slega [8]

Answer:

Following are the solution to this question:

Step-by-step explanation:

It provides three different hypotheses in such a two-factor ANOVA:

In point A:

H o: With all factor A levels, the ways are equivalent

Ha: A least another element A level does have a transfer to another

In point B:

Ha: The least one Factor A the level does have a transfer to another

H o: With all Factor B levels the results are about the same.

In point C:

Ha: At most one Variable B level does have a transfer than any other level.

H o: There are no interactions among the factors

Ha: The interactions of factors are important

When ANOVA is executed, they get three p-sets (one for all 3 hypotheses)

(a) If Variable A's p-value is much less alpha, we will reject the null and embrace Ha and infer that Factor A is important. Anything else, H o also isn't rejected and that there is no evidence which Factor A is important

(b) If p- is < alpha, otherwise we reject The null, accept Ha, and infer which Factor B is relevant. Factor B is significant. Conversely, we may not condemn H o but claim there isn't enough proof which Factor B is important

(c)

If they reject H o and agree to the point p- for the A x B interaction is a < alpha Ha, and conclude that the interaction from A to B is important. So, perhaps we can deny H o and claim, that neither proof of interactions is sufficient From A to B.

8 0

3 years ago

The square root of -108 minus the square root of -3

Lady_Fox [76]

square root(-108) - square root(-3) =8.66025404 i

6 0

3 years ago

The right expression to calculate how much money will be in an investment account 14 years from now if you deposit $5,000 now an

Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

The expression to compute the amount in the investment account after 14 years is: <em>FV</em> = [5000 ×(1.10)¹⁴] + [3000 ×(1.10)⁸].

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula to compute the future value is:

$FV=PV[1+\frac{r}{100}]^{n}$

PV = Present value

r = interest rate

n = number of periods.

It is provided that $5,000 were deposited now and $3,000 deposited after 6 years at 10% compound interest. The amount of time the money is invested for is 14 years.

The expression to compute the amount in the investment account after 14 years is,

$FV=5000[1+\frac{10}{100}]^{14}+3000[1+\frac{10}{100}]^{14-6}\\FV=5000[1+0.10]^{14}+3000[1+0.10]^{8}$