Answer:
<u>Price</u> risk is the risk of a decline in a bond's value due to an increase in interest rates. This risk is higher on bonds that have long maturities than on bonds that will mature in the near future.
<u>Reinvestment</u> risk is the risk that a decline in interest rates will lead to a decline in income from a bond portfolio. This risk is obviously high on callable bonds. It is also high on short-term bonds because the shorter the bond's maturity, the fewer the years before the relatively high old-coupon bonds will be replaced with new low-coupon issues.
Which type of risk is more relevant to an investor depends on the investor's <u>investment horizon</u>, which is the period of time an investor plans to hold a particular investment.
Answer: D. Vesey had purchased his freedom after winning the lottery.
Explanation:
Denmark Vasey was a African American leader in the early 19th century who was born into slavery but was able to buy his freedom when he won a lottery.
In 1822, he was accused of a conspiracy to organize a slavery revolt that would have seen thousands of African Americans killing slave owners in South Carolina and then sailing to Haiti. They had him executed at the age of 55 for this alleged crime.
They are allowed to do that as long as it was staff who searched it but even then it is pretty intrusive to your privacy.
hope this helps have a great day!
Answer:
The $18 per unit is a:
sunk cost.
Explanation:
Chang's cost incurred per unit of $18 is a sunk cost. A sunk cost is a cost that has already been incurred. It does not make a difference in a future decision. This implies the Chang may decide to correct the defect or otherwise. What decision it takes should be based on the cost and revenue that results from the next decision, and not the past decision.
Answer:
The correct option is D) The design of the study suffers from selection bias.
Explanation:
In research, Selection Bias occurs when the researcher decides who the respondents are or those who are being evaluated or studied.
Every research ought to be designed in such a way that the respondents are selected at random.
In the information provided, the respondents were selected from a group of people who on a balance of probability were already inclined to decline because it was a list of dissatisfied customers. The chances of them declining to respond or responding with a negative were higher than the chances of them indicating that they would buy and this defeats the purpose of the research. The research ought to have also included a sample of respondents who didn't have the product, who had enjoyed the services of the company and were content, those who didn't even know what the product did until they got the survey.
That way holistic information can be obtained from the research about how different sets of people will react and not just those who are already dissatisfied with the company's product(s).
Some of the ways to avoid selection bias in research are:
- To employ the use of random techniques selecting sample sets from populations.
- To check that the traits or characteristics of the larger population are well represented in the samples selected
Cheers