A is a soldier that it hired for pay by a foreign state is often referred to as a "mercenary" since they are simply hired to help the state in question carry out military objectives.
The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
Answer:
C pat robertson in the 1988 Presidential campaign.
<span>Because, of the mixture of ethnic groups in the land. Control of land and ethnic groups moved back and forth between these empires.</span>
