All categories

2 years ago

Pls help if you can Thx!

Mathematics

2 answers:

k0ka [10]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The Answer Is E!

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this equation., you have to try every solution and the only one that perfectly completes both statements is answer E.

We subtract the $1.15 from $2.10 if this is the price of one taco, leaving the price of a small cup of coffees price ($2.10-$1.15=$0.95 for a small cup of coffee

To check it fits both statements, we multiply the price of one coffee by 3 ()$0.95×3=$2.85 for three small coffees\

Next, we multiply $1.15 (one taco) by 2 to fill in the expression ($1.15×2=$2.30)

Finally, we add both the prices of the 3 coffees and two tacos which adds up to a perfect $5.15, justifying the answer

N76 [4]2 years ago

6 0

GIVEN:

Cost of a taco and a cup of tea = $2.10

x + y = 2.10 ...(1)

Cost of 2 tacos and 3 cup of tea = $5.15

2x + 3y = 5.15 ...(2)

ANSWER:

On solving eq(1), we get

x = 2.10 – y

Substitute the value of x in eq(2), we get

2(2.10 – y) + 3y = 5.15
4.20 – 2y + 3y = 5.15
y = 5.15 – 4.20
y = 0.95

So, x = 2.10 – 0.95

x = 1.15

Hence, Cost of a taco is $1.15

So, Correct choice - [E] $1.15

You might be interested in

Y = 3x + 13 y = -2x - 22 substitution method show work pls someone help quick

laiz [17]

Answer:

x = -7

Step-by-step explanation:

3x + 13 = -2x - 22

subtract 13 from both sides

3x = -2x - 35

Add 2x to both sides

5x = -35

Divide each side by 5

x = -7

5 0

2 years ago

A computer software vendor claims that a new version of its operating system will crash fewer than 10 times per year on average.

Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The hypothesis is written as follows

For the null hypothesis,

µd ≤ 10

For the alternative hypothesis,

µ > 10

This is a right tailed test

Since no population standard deviation is given, the distribution is a student's t.

Since n = 97

Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 97 - 1 = 96

t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)

Where

x = sample mean = 8.9

µ = population mean = 10

s = samples standard deviation = 3.6

t = (8.9 - 10)/(3.6/√97) = - 3

We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes

p = 0.00172

Since alpha, 0.01 > than the p value, 0.00172, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 1% level of significance, there is enough evidence that the data do not support the vendor’s claim.

3 0

3 years ago

A brand of clay brick tiles has the dimensions 3 5 8 by 7 5 8 by 1 2 inch. These thin bricks are commonly used for floors. Estim

raketka [301]

Answer: The cost to tile the floor is $318.24.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we have given that

Dimensions of floor is 12 by 17 foot.

So, Area of floor would be

$12\times 17\\\\=204\ sq.\ foot$

As we know that 1 foot = 12 inch

So, Area of floor would be

$204\times (12)^2\\\\=204\times 144\\\\=29376\ sq.\ foot$

Dimension of brick tiles is given by

$3\dfrac{5}{8}\ by\ 7\dfrac{5}{8}\ by\ \dfrac{1}{2}$

So, Area of brick tiles is given by

$2(lb+bh+lh)\\\\=2(\dfrac{29}{8}\times \dfrac{61}{8}+\dfrac{61}{8}\times \dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{29}{8}\times \dfrac{1}{2})\\\\=2(\dfrac{1769}{64}+\dfrac{61}{16}+\dfrac{29}{16})\\\\=2\times \dfrac{1769+244+116}{64}\\\\=\dfrac{2129}{32}$

So, Number of clay brick would be

$29376\div \dfrac{2129}{32}\\\\=29376\times \dfrac{32}{2129}\\\\=\dfrac{29376\times 32}{2129}\\\\=441.53\\\\\approx 442$

cost of each clay brick = $0.72

So, Total cost of flooring would be

$442\times 0.72\\\\=\$318.24$

Hence, The cost to tile the floor is $318.24.

7 0

2 years ago

As a salesperson at Max’s Mattresses, Richard earns $250 plus $15 for each mattress he sells. Which equation can Richard use to

DedPeter [7]

Answer:

e = 250 + 15m

Step-by-step explanation:

The earnings or "e" are determined by the solution of the $250 he's earned from the start and the $15 he earns are dependent on the amount of mattresses he's sold so "m" has to be multiplied by the 15.

4 0

3 years ago

Describe the end behavior of the given function f(x)=9x^3-x^2-8x+6

Mekhanik [1.2K]

As x approaches -inf f(x) -> -inf
and as x approaches inf, f(x) approaches +inf

Mark brainliest please

6 0

2 years ago