Comparing, the answer is either comparing or contrasting.
I believe it's "C" since the enlightenment was about questioning the way the curch taught about god
If the border with Laos had been closed and North Vietnam had not been able to operate in the country, the communist side would not have been able to stock up on resources, men, ammunition, weapons, food and medicine through the HoChi Minh Trail.
Therefore, the forces of the North that were fighting in South Vietnam would have been out of supply, and their defeat would have been imminent.
Answer:
The U.S. Constitution protects the unalienable right to liberty by including the principle of habeas corpus. Including the principle of habeas corpus protects an individual from unlawful detention and grants individual specific rights to legal counsel and certain judiciary procedures to protect an individuals liberty.
Explanation:
hope this helps
The correct answer is A. Supported of slavery insisted It was moral because it was practiced in biblical times, while abolitionists argued that it was immoral because God created all people in His Image.
Explanation:
Slavery was a common practice during the 1800s in the Southern states that depended on it due to its economic model based on agriculture; at the same time, this practice was strongly opposed by the northern states that had an industrialized economic model. These opposite points of view about slavery were supported through different arguments including moral arguments that focused on whether slavery was ethical or "correct".
About this, people in the south and general supporters of slavery promoted the idea slavery was moral because it was a common practice during the history and was even part of the bible, which they consider as the law of God. On the opposite, abolitionists stated God had created all people as equal because everyone including slaves were made in His Image.
