The focus on selling indulgences became so important because when the Renaissance period came, the church was losing its power, so people were able to freely buy things they wanted, even if they didn't needed them, and to not fear about being charged, beaten up, or even end up dead just because the church didn't thought its appropriate. Also, a very big factor was the fact that the people in this period, in general, had more money than the people in the Middle Ages, so the increased financial power enabled them to buy things that they found interesting but were not necessities.
Until 1921, the Russian economy was completely mutilated and destroyed by war communism. Socialism did not start in good light, so Lenin became worried about the overall state of the economy. the war of communism that lasted from 1918 to 1921 brought the economy to a complete collapse. In March 1921, the Kronshtadt Rebellion happened, which convinced Lenin that changes in the economy should be made. Thus, in 1922. he revised economic policy and introduced the so-called new economic policy (NEP). The peasants were allowed to sell part of their property for profit, and traders were allowed to engage in business. He was thinking that it would last for decades, but only seven years later in 1928. Lenin's successor, Stalin, centralized the economy and again nationalized a huge part of the economy.
Popular Sovereignty is your answer.
Hope this is helpful! Have a good one.
Answer:
It is said that with Cupid's Arrows, He can control the ability to make people fall in love Instantaneously, Even if it is not true love and the selected people don't know each other. As the son of Mars and Venus [Basing this off of Roman Mythology] He controlled Romance, Erotic Love, Affection e.t.c . Cupid fell in love himself with Psyche and we have seen where that went.
Cupid's story tells us that You cannot love without trust. You may love someone but, without trusting that person, your love life will never succeed. I didn't understand your question but, I answered what I could gather from this.
Explanation:
When analyzing a source historians want to remain NEUTRAL in other words they don't want to be PERSUADED by personal feelings and options they know the different sources may reveal different OPINIONS
