what are you trying to say here exactly
“One of the strangest controversies in the history of Orientalism turned upon the “origin of bhakti”, as if devotion had at some given moment been a new idea and thenceforth a fashionable one. It would have been simpler to observe that the word bhakti means primarily a given share, and therefore also the devotion or love that all liberality presupposes; and so that inasmuch as one “gives God his share” (bhagam), i.e. sacrifces, one is his bhakta. Thus in the hymn, “If thou givest me my share” amounts to saying “If thou lovest me”. It has often been pointed out that the Sacrifice was thought of as a commerce between Gods and men: but not often realised that by introducing into traditional conceptions of trade notions derived from our own internecine commercial transactions, we have falsified our understanding of the original sense of such a commerce, which was actually more of the potlatsh type, a competition in giving, than like our competitions in taking.
Number 6 is D
Hshshshahahahah
Well, if you look close enough there is proof look at the way that the continents are shaped and some fossils have been found in 2 places but on completely different continents.
Answer:
First, I will take help from administrative records related to the agriculture in tribal areas. Then, I will study the old records, notices and information related to the same. Finally, I will collect the information from the documents produced by different researchers in country as well as outside the country.
