Answer:
oh um okie O-O not random at all
I think it’s 0.81 meters per second¿
Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
Answer:
you can take over the world mwahahaha, muwhahaha, muahahaha, bwahahaha
Explanation:
The citizens of Rome put the good of the republic ahead of their own desires and the Founding Fathers hoped American people would do the same. Severing in public office without financial gain was important in the success of the country.
