Answer: Hello There!!
<em>
</em><em>Key Points</em>
<em>The Bill of Right’s provision on the freedom of speech was incorporated against the states in Gitlow v. New York (1925).</em>
<em>Core political speech, expressive speech, and most types of commercial speech are protected under the First Amendment.</em>
<em>Certain types of speech (particularly, speech that can h.arm others) is not protected, such as obscenity, fighting words, true threats, defamation, or invasion of privacy. Speech related to national security or state secrets may also not be protected.
</em><em>Freedom of Speech
</em><em>Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions as well.</em>
<em />
<em>The freedom of speech is not absolute. The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are excluded, and it has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.</em>
<em />
<em>Critici-m of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. There are exceptions to these general protections. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others. Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.The freedom of speech is not absolute. The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are excluded, and it has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.
</em>
Explanation: I hope this helps!!
William Wilberforce was an English politician, philanthropist, and a leader of the movement to stop the slave trade.
The North had very little supplies at Fort Sumter, so they had to fight while being conservative with heir supplies. The South, however, battered the Fort with over 300 shells, until the commanding officer in the Fort inevitably surrendered.
Answer:
The plan took away power belonging to the Cabinet.
The plan increased the powers of the presidency
The plan created less accountability to the Senate
Explanation:
It is Caligula!!:)
Write at least 20 characters to explain it well.
