Okay, I did a bit of research and I found out that your question on your quiz/test/assignment is this: Which of the following cannot be said about Zhu Xi's neo- Confucianism.
The correct answer is: It asserted that the ideal human is the warrior
Hope I helped!
France, <span>Belgium, </span><span>Serbia, </span><span>Greece, </span><span>Japan </span>
<span>Sanford B. Dole is the answer</span>
Answer:
Both Account A and Account B corroborate the Panthers' account by claiming that Panthers were at pizza place on the night the locker room was vandalized.
Explanation:
Given:
There are two statements given one by Panther quarterback's older sister and the other from the Bears running back.
Solution:
Corroboration is basically to compare the pieces of evidence and observing that where they agree and disagree. Many pieces of proof that say same thing makes the arguments stronger
So if we see both the statements, we can say that both Account A and Account B corroborate the Panthers' account. Both Account A and B claim that the Panthers were at pizza place on the night the locker room was vandalized. Both defend Panthers. In Account A Panther quarterback's older sister saying that she drove them to the pizza place and in Account B, Bears also says that he saw the Panthers at the pizza place. Both say same thing which makes this argument stronger. Hence Account A and Account B corroborate the Panthers' account.
