Answer:
Fourth Option: It introduces the topic and involves the reader in the activity.
Explanation:
Bob Kowalski in his article "A big Year" gives a slight clue to what the article is about i.e. <em>see a bird.</em> So it is about seeing birds. Another very important effect achieved by this line is that the writer engages the reader right from the beginning by directly addressing the reader. He creates a curiosity in reader's mind about why one needs to go the ends of the earth just to see a bird.
First option is incorrect because there is nothing such idea (birding being silly thing) neither in the first line nor anywhere in the article.
Second option is incorrect because the birders are not yet introduced in this line.
Third option is also incorrect because there is nothing such idea in the first line or anywhere in the article.
They persecuted them
hope this helps<span />
Answer:
Appeal to pity.
Explanation:
A fallacy is elucidated as the error or flaw in reasoning or logic of an argument that makes it invalid and unsound and affects its validity.
'Appeal to pity' is demonstrated as the fallacy or illogical reasoning in which the arguer attempts to gain support of the audience through exploitation of the opponent's emotions of pity.
In the given example, <u>'appeal to pity'</u> fallacy has been demonstrated as the <u>author illogically aims to establish the truth of his conclusion('return of anti-semitism') and win audience's support emotionally by manipulating the opposition's sense of emotion or pity</u>('find it incredibly ironic that he and other Moral Majority types conveniently overlook the fact that they, too, pack away a pretty tidy sum themselves through their fund-raising efforts which is deplorable'). Thus, <u>'appeal to pity'</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:they should not
Explanation: because if one person hunts down a zebra more and more people will start doing it and their population would decrease
Theses are the awswers that I got:
A.- 3
B.-4
C.-2
D.-1
