1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shtirlitz [24]
3 years ago
6

What language developed in the Jewish communities of eastern Europe?

History
2 answers:
ivann1987 [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Yiddish is one Language I know of that developed in Europe

larisa86 [58]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Among the most widely spoken Jewish languages to develop in the diaspora are Yiddish, Ladino, and the Judæo-Arabic group of languages. Yiddish is the Judeo-German language developed by Ashkenazi Jews who lived in Central and Eastern Europe before the Holocaust.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What influenced Medieval Art
rodikova [14]
Medieval art was influenced by both the Romans and Byzantine Art. It was mostly focused on religion and Christianity. It included architectural details like stained glass art, large murals on walls and domed ceilings, and carvings on buildings and columns. It also included illuminated manuscript art and sculpture.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Patrick Henry was influential to the adoption of which piece
tangare [24]
<span>He was influential in getting the Bill of Rights added to the Constitution.


I hope this helps :)</span>
3 0
4 years ago
What statement about the necessary and proper clause is accurate? It is the source of implied powers. It is written so as not to
wel

It is the source of implied powers.

The necessary and proper clasue gives Congress the power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing power. It enables Congress to make the laws required for the exercise of its other powers established by the Constitution


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hey guys I could really use your help on this
-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

h m m m i'm not really sure to be honest.but i feel like we should open up more to third parties because they rarely win and i feel like there's more good people i'm not really sure.right now?maybe.both trump and Biden aren't good in ways so yeah.third parties should have a chance to speak

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Discuss the Hundred Years’ War: What were its causes? Why did the war continue for such a long period? What advantages did each
Dahasolnce [82]

Answer and explanation :

The Hundred Years' War was battled among France and England during the late Middle Ages. It kept going 116 years from 1337 to 1453. The war began in light of the fact that Charles IV of France kicked the bucket in 1328 without a child. Edward III of England at that point accepted he reserved the option to turn into the new lord of France through his mom.  

Its fundamental reason was a dynastic squabble that begun when the triumph of England by William of Normandy made a state lying on the two sides of the English Channel. In the fourteenth penny. the English rulers held the duchy of Guinness in France; they disdained paying reverence to the French rulers, and they dreaded the expanding control applied by the French crown over its incredible primitive vassals.  

The speedy explanations behind the Hundred Years War were the mistake of Edward III of England with the disappointment by Philip VI of France of his vows to restore a bit of Guinness taken by Charles IV; the English undertakings to control Flanders, a critical market for English downy and a wellspring of texture; and Philip's assistance of Scotland against England.

None of the members fell like surrendering while they were winning, or until they ended up depleted from the battling, their treasuries were vacant, and they needed to confront political restriction at home.  

There were two noteworthy minutes when the war could have been viewed as done and done, at any rate superficially.  

One such happened in 1360 with the Treaty of Bretigny, where the fundamental dispute point - the status of the Duchy of Aquitaine - was settled in English support. The developed duchy were to stay in Plantagenet hands, who were freed from any need to make a solemn vow to the Valois Kings of France. Consequently, Edward III surrendered his case on the French crown.  

In any case, various focuses consented to were disregarded or exceptionally delayed in being executed as a general rule. Very little has changed in France basically, with groups of meandering criminals flying English hues ravaging the wide open, nobles remaining faithful to 'an inappropriate' party, overseers infringing where they shouldn't, and payments staying unpaid.  

At last Charles V of France figured out how to settle the circumstance to such degree that he could recharge the war in 1369 at the affectation of dishonesty from the English, and win back a large portion of what his precursors have lost. The war trudged on.  

Second such occasion occurred in 1420, with the Treaty of Troyes. This bargain could be viewed as a reasonable triumph for the English. If it somehow happened to turn out to be in excess of a dead letter, that is. Henry V of England were to wed Charles' girl Catherine, become the official of France, and, after Charles' demise, the King of France.  

With the goal for this to occur, the dauphin Charles must be proclaimed ill-conceived, a massively shameful thing for an illustrious line the dauphin could never acknowledge.  

At the point when Catherine brought forth a child (additionally named Henry) the fate of the individual relationship among England and France appeared to be fixed. Notwithstanding, Henry V kicked the bucket of loose bowels just couple of weeks before Charles VI saw his last, and a regime must be set up for the minor Henry VI.  

An illustrious minority can be viewed as a comparable issue to regal dementia, with a ton of intensity winding up misled by those nearest to the ruler. The dauphin kept on taking up arms against his foes, and the war didn't end until thirty-three years have gone since the marking of the Treaty of Troyes.  

The Hundred Years War incurred untold hopelessness on France. Farmlands were ruined, the populace was destroyed by war, starvation, and the Black Death, and pirates threatened the field. Common wars and nearby wars expanded the obliteration and the social deterioration. However the successor of Charles VII, Louis XI, profited by these shades of malice.  

The virtual annihilation of the primitive honorability empowered him to join France all the more unequivocally under the imperial power and to advance and align with the working class. From the remnants of the war an altogether new France developed. For England, the aftereffects of the war were similarly definitive; it stopped to be a mainland power and progressively looked for development as a maritime power.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the four natural resources needed for British industrialization?
    10·1 answer
  • How was the Lend-Lease program a significant departure from the policy of neutrality? It gave American convoys permission to att
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the United States support Panama’s independence from Colombia? Panama had been oppressed by Colombia for years. Colombia
    15·1 answer
  • Who did the Native Americans ally with during the American Revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • ILL MARK FIRST ANSWER BRAINLIST
    15·2 answers
  • Which organization's name correctly completes this table?
    15·1 answer
  • What district &amp; city was Black Wall Street located?
    14·1 answer
  • Napisz jakie były roznice miedzy prawami kobiet i mezczyzn w starozytnych Atenach
    14·1 answer
  • How did the U.S. expand its navy so quickly
    13·1 answer
  • What advantage did the British have during the American Revolution?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!